Cut-price supermarket booze to be banned to stamp out binge drinking

Not really, its taboo and they start young and keep doing it. Kids in europe dont do it.

It isn't because it's taboo; it is because children on the continent don't see adults staggering out of pubs at 2pm. They don't see their parents shipping them off to their grandparents every weekend so they can go out and get drunk. If we allowed children in this country to drink at 14 (for example), we'd increase our problems. It's a cultural thing - people of all ages drink to get drunk, something which doesn't happen a lot in other countries. Children witness this, and it influences them.
 
I love these threads, somehow alcohol goes from being a quick beer in the pub with mates to being the most dangerious thing in Britain today.

Alcahol is totally besides the point anyway, whats needed is educating the young about alcohol and the good/bad things about it, and some sort of solution to the current social 'breakdown' problems. Without being too right wing about it, ive got mates from working class families and mates from middle class families, and i know exactly which are more likely to develop problems with drink. Not through any fault of their own (im not Hitler) but simply because of their circamstances and upbringing.
 
It isn't because it's taboo; it is because children on the continent don't see adults staggering out of pubs at 2pm. They don't see their parents shipping them off to their grandparents every weekend so they can go out and get drunk. If we allowed children in this country to drink at 14 (for example), we'd increase our problems. It's a cultural thing - people of all ages drink to get drunk, something which doesn't happen a lot in other countries. Children witness this, and it influences them.

I didnt say we should lower drinking to 14, I was saying that we need to get rid of this image. Education is the key, however I think we should perhaps allow drinking with parents with meals more well known as not many people know this. This will in turn allow kids to drink alcohol with parent supervison, and we need to stop supermarkets seeling alcohol to under 18's. Personally I believe a one strike and you cant sell alcohol rule would scare a lot of supermarkets into action.
 
however I think we should perhaps allow drinking with parents with meals more

I think you must be making an assumption that this doesnt already happen?

I know a lot of people who will let there kids drink, to a sensible level. If they abuse this, then they loose that privlage.

Raising the drinking age to 21 wouldnt make a huge differance, as people already dont stick to the 18 limit. What raising the limit would do, would be to make it easier to recognise when people are drinking under the legal age.

e.g. shift the current drinking age from 14-15, up to 17-18.
 
Are the general public of this country to be trusted to do the right thing though? If you lower it to 14 then it gives Mr and Mrs Chav family even more reason to not give a **** about what their kids are up to. "It's legal innit"

There is a hard core of people out there that don't give a ****, expecting them to act responsibly in the current climate is a non starter.
 
This is not really a conversation related to this thread, but of course they are overlords. They govern what you are and are not alllowed to do. Alcohol costs more money in healthcare and damages than any other substance, legal or otherwise, and yet remains perfectly legal. Marijuana, on the other hand, has a tiny pecentage of the associated costs and effects on health, but consuming it is an arrestable offence.

This indicates one rule for one drug, and one for another. Why is alcohol acceptable, even though it destroys lives, causes addictions and costs me, the tax payer, a god-damned fortune every year? Because it's taxed. It's taxed, and it is "controlled".

The governing body has the power to cut off supplies of one substance (this is not a discussion about smuggling), but allows another entry into the population to keep the mob happy* and under control. If that's not an overlord, i dont know what is.

*And this is a valid point. If alcohol was banned, imagine the uproar. Imagine what would happen to this country if they banned alcohol. It would be chaos! Alcohol is to the UK what Guns are to the US. It's a part of our society. The fat, football hooligan binge drinker defines us as a people. Everyone is acting like a price increase is like taking away their God given right to have what they deserve. Like they're owed it or something.

Alcohol is a luxury. Luxuries come at a price. I honestly don't see why a price inscrease is a problem.

Why should a minority be able to change things for the majority of the country? :mad: Why is alcohol a luxury? We should be allowed to do what we want.
 
The single biggest cost in the country to longterm healthcare, emergency healthcare, police time and medical time is not a minority.

Also, i'd like to see someone here suggest some feasable ways to let half the population do what they like, whilst simaltaneously policing the other half (sorry, the minority) in to not binge drinking or consuming excessive alcohol and thus causing damage to themselves, others and the environment around them.

you cant treat some people differently to others. it makes them angry. look at the muslim issue we have, and how angry people get about that.

It's hilarious people saying "the minority are ruining it". You're making yourselves victims. Like babies throwing toys out of prams.
 
Alcohol destroys lives? No the people intoxicated by alcohol who willing take it to the excess and then do thing they shouldn't, destroy lives. But still a minority. Obesity causes issues on the NHS like smoking, also not handling dangerous equipment also costs lots. Life’s dangerous; life’s also for living you cannot ban cars because people get killed on the road.

Im not asking you to ban alcohol so your car example is moot. However, i will respond to it with:
"No but you can enforce speed limits and fine people when they defy them. ths reducing the number of people who speed" (regardless of how much it is reduced)
You can increase the cost of alcohol, thus reducing the amount of people who can afford to take it to extremes.

Guns dont kill people, people do. But why give them guns in the first place? :)
 
DampCat - have you got anything to prove that by fining people who speed less people speed?
 
It's a disgrace, and if you ask me doing that, and it's stupid making the age 21.
Think about it, people from the age of say 14 upwards are going to want to go drinking.
Problem is, generally severely underage drinkers have no experience with it and then try to out do their mates, getting way to drunk.
You raise the age you're just creating more of a problem, alcohol is a good thing.
Getting drunk once in a while is a good thing to.

I wish labour would stop canvasing with this sensationalist bull****. Look at what our government is actually doing for the people, taking away rights, taxing us to hell, and letting themselves be pushed about by america.
Makes me sick to my gut when people get sucked into the trap.
 
Last edited:
DampCat - have you got anything to prove that by fining people who speed less people speed?

Yes i have a whole database of every speeding ticket ever issued over the last 15 years, thus beign able to track trends in volumes, on a USB key in my back pocket.

Are you telling me that because i have no figures for that one tiny thing, that there are 0 people in the world that think "hell, i better not speed, i dont want to pay a fine and possibly lose my licence!"

Please, try addressing the rest of my statement, and not focusing on the one thing you think you can get an edge on.
 
It is pretty self evident that the existence of speeding fines makes at least some of us stick to the limits when we otherwise wouldn't.

some people might, but overall is it going down?

Yes i have a whole database of every speeding ticket ever issued over the last 15 years, thus beign able to track trends in volumes, on a USB key in my back pocket.

Are you telling me that because i have no figures for that one tiny thing, that there are 0 people in the world that think "hell, i better not speed, i dont want to pay a fine and possibly lose my licence!"

Please, try addressing the rest of my statement, and not focusing on the one thing you think you can get an edge on.

It was a silly thing to say unless you can back it up though, I was hoping you were going to provide figures for the last few years that would show less speeding fines being sent out given the rise in speed cameras.
 
Back
Top Bottom