Conspiracy Files: The Third Tower

Oh and this guy is brilliant just ripping apart the whole argument.

No explosive noises
No explosives
No broken windows from explosives going off
etc etc.
 
ScarySquirrel said:
It doesn't seem biased to me. They seem to be covering the points AGAINST it being a controlled demolition quite a lot.
Click to expand...

yeah, as I said this part is very good. However the beginning of it about the free fall and comparing it to other towers was not. It was 100% biased with no counter claims and they weren't even asking the right people.
 
1-1.gif


2-1.gif


3-1.gif
 
Last edited:
*Moangroan* said:
Wasn;t this the building the bloke said ''pull it''. Was it the mayor or some official. A term usually meant to mean bring it down in demolishing terms as I assume you lot know. So this building may have been pre-packed with explosive ??? dunno ..
Click to expand...


Yes, of course. All buildings are pre-packed with explosives when they are built, it's standard practice. Who doesn't know that?

Sheesh.

Or, of course, an invisible demolition team rigged it with invisible explosives beforehand.

A controlled demolition is not something that can be set up in a building that's heavily used without anyone noticing, nor can it be set up quickly.

As for why these towers collapse when the structure fails, it's because they're very carefully designed and built to do so. They're built in cities - you don't want them falling over sideways and destroying everything nearby.
 
That architect is great. The smoke isn't coming out o tower 7..

Wtf the videos clear show the smoke coming out the windows in nice neat columns before merging into a normal smoke column..

He's an idiot.
 
UnusualSuspect said:
And if you're so knowledgable about the design of the Towers, then you'd also know that the metal structure is built to withstand the heat that could be caused by jet engine fuel. It was also designed with aircraft impacts in mind. Look it up, the actual structural designer for the Two Towers has spoken out about it.
Click to expand...

When steel is heated it loses some degree of its strength. It doesn't have to melt in order to become too weak to support the load, especially when an extremely heavy object has been rammed into it at extremely high speed.
 
I like a good conspiracy theory, this one just seems quite obviously untrue though. Can anyone think of a single reason why they would go the effort of blowing the building up when the twin towers are their target? It doesn't make sense, there's just no reason to do it.
 
You have hundreds of experts and conspiracy theorists that propagate these unsubstantiated claims, vast numbers of people hook into these and the cycle goes on and becasue the US government has not really refuted these claims other than the FEMA investigation this is used to further fuel the conspiracy.

For me the only conspiracy is the US government letting these will claims run it gives them the perfect excuse to operate under the radar so to speak.

Also think of the sheer number of people required to pull off a conspiracy of this size do you really believe that something of this magnitude could be kept quiet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom