David Icke is a candidate for the Haltemprice by-election.

So everyone they claim is a reptile must not be one, as the Queen/Blair/Bush get photo'ed all the time.

I'm not the best person to be answering probably since it isn't my claim but I think the argument goes that those folks are just figureheads and aren't the reptilians at all, they are merely puppets and the reptilians have the ability to control their shape to an extent anyway.

Actually just typing that makes me wonder how anyone else can do so and propose it seriously.
 
OK the general jist of the talk is that moving closer and closer to a big brother state and the world is really being ruled by shadowy groups like the CFR, Club of Rome, Bilderbergs, Trilateral Commision and they control, make and break the governments of world, control the media and also the banking system. Is that an exageration? Or are we really in a free society?

Show me some evidence for these shadowy groups. Not peoples opinions, or coincidences, but actual evidence for the existence of these groups and how they control, make and break the governments of the world.

You're obviously entitled to your opinion, it's a free society ;), you would get less of a hostile response if you provided some evidence to back up your opinions though. You should also review the evidence the other side of the argument provide as well.
 
Magick, can you go into depth about the lizard overlords please? I'm quite curious as to what David Icke thinks, and what you think.
 
I've said it before and i'll say it again, David Icke is a genius. He's made a fortune off the back of a complete load of nonsense. I wish I had his money.
 
I thought you had posted in the thread where that picture was originally. But no, that is allegedly what one of the reptilians looks like when they get a picture taken - it has been greyscaled though as the first picture looked vaguely like reptile boy was on fire. Or do a search for "lizard dildos" and you should find it.

Looks like I missed that thread, but it's a classic. I could swear I've seen the *****-esque gif before though when looking for images of nanotubes or DNA though...:confused:
 
Show me some evidence for these shadowy groups.

Do a search for the groups they all have there own websites.

Murf said:
Not peoples opinions, or coincidences, but actual evidence for the existence of these groups and how they control, make and break the governments of the world

The evidence is right in front of your face if you can join the dots.
 
Do a search for the groups they all have there own websites.
I for one knew these groups existed.

You're going to have to give evidence they do what you claim though.

The evidence is right in front of your face if you can join the dots.
I know it's rude, but I am actually laughing at you right now. I'm not going to try to hide my mocking.
 
Last edited:
Do a search for the groups they all have there own websites.



The evidence is right in front of your face if you can join the dots.

It's poor form to make such a massive claim as "the world is run by lizard-men" and then not back it up with any evidence. And "join the dots" isn't a convincing argument; that's the kind of tosh nutters who can't substantiate their claims say....
 
I for one knew these groups existed.

You're going to have to give evidence they do what you claim though.

I know it's rude, but I am actually laughing at you right now. I'm not going to try to hide my mocking.

Plenty of evidence out there and I'm not going to type long winded posts repeating what can be found from 15 mins of googling.
 
There is definitely some truth in Bilderberg being an influential group that is purposely kept out of the media spotlight.

The argument goes that if 50 top celebrities met for a secret meeting once a year the press would be all over it. However 50 top politicians, business heads and members of royal families can meet behind closed doors and it hardly gets a mention.

It obviously could look like a conspiracy.....but what is actually going on we don't know.

If it is innocent I'm still against it, because I don't think public representatives decision making behind closed doors with private business people and monarchs is democratic.
 
Last edited:
Plenty of evidence out there and I'm not going to type long winded posts repeating what can be found from 15 mins of googling.
That's because your "evidence" is either non-existent or just plain nonsense.

Don't bother bringing up retarded rubbish if you're not going to back it up.

And for the record I have read all this sort of junk "evidence" before, but I grew out of it. I think I was about fifteen the last time I paid any serious attention to this nonsense, then I discovered logic and critical thinking.

The argument goes that if 50 top celebrities met for a secret meeting once a year the press would be all over it. However 50 top politicians, business heads and members of royal families can meet behind closed doors and it hardly gets a mention.
It's just rich people talking about money, hardly news-worthy. lol.
 
Last edited:
Plenty of evidence out there and I'm not going to type long winded posts repeating what can be found from 15 mins of googling.

I'm sure you have loads of those pages bookmarked - maybe your googling skills are better than mine but I can't find anything convincing, could you be so kind as to share your knowledge? ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom