How does the likelyhood of engine torque and power overcoming mechanical grip have anything to do with driver skill?
The driver can learn to modulate around it, sure, or you can fit electronics that limit the power so you don't get all of it when you can't use it, but that's not a substitute for understanding the physics involved. The weight moves when you accelerate hard, away from the front of the car and to the back, that why RWD is better in that regard, and why 4WD systems push power to the back under acceleration.
That Fez is slow.
6 seconds to 60 in a lightweight, 200bhp car?
Should be knocking early 5's out to be honest.
It may well be motors, but some of the people in here really do lack in common sense and driving ablilty.
I'm sure I lack in driving ability...but I do have some common sense.
InvG

Looks fantastic.
Sure, no 4wd for the 0-60 whores but bar coming out of real tight slow corners 2wd will be no problem.
Most people who comment have never even driven a high power FWD car anyway.

Most people who comment have never even driven a high power FWD car anyway.


True
People tend to overlook that generally in a 2wd car you outbreak all them 4wd rallyslags! Even dare I say it, corner faster to!
Sure you know the name of that guy who races(still?) the rover coupe at the castle coombe championship? Its slipped my mind but he done awesome job v much higher powered 4wd cars.
Most people who comment have never even driven a high power FWD car anyway.

I'll take a stab in the dark and say the ford team might know a little bit more on which system was best for the new focus.
Could be wrong though, I see a lot of you have designed cars before.

I question Ford's design team being the major factor here. They will only work with what they have been told to design/spec to work too by Ford's marketing & cheeses at the top ultimately coming down to $$$. Left in the hands of the ever so creative design team you would end up with an actual concept making it through to production and it would therefore have 4WD![]()