Is Usain Bolt clean?

The 2nd 100m is faster than the first, or at least that is how johnson set the 19.32s. However i doubt that Bolt will do anything like 9.7 over the first 100m as he will probably fade on the straight.
As for the question, if he is at it they probably all are at it...

Johnson did 10.12 for the first 100m and 9.2 for the second 100m IIRC. Pretty much what you would expect due to the rolling start; Donovan Bailey has clocked sub-9s with a rolling start, although obviously not after having done 100m beforehand.

One thing I did notice is on this video of Bolt (skip to 07:24), there's a clock in the background. It doesn't come properly into view until about 8.7s and he's already been easing off before then :eek:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympics/athletics/7565572.stm

The startling thing is really over the first 50m he's not really that far in front. I suppose being a 200m running first and foremost means he can maintain his speed for longer, from 50-80m it's a joke, he pulls away from them as if they are running in treacle or something.
 
Last edited:
Its a fair point, never say never etc etc. But Im sure I read somewhere that with human reaction time and all that jazz, a scientist came out and said that it was humanly impossible to break 9.5 seconds.

Dont get me wrong, the record will be broken and broken soon. But to go down to anywhere near what some above have been saying I think is highly highly unlikely.

I wished Bolt had kept going flat out....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympics/athletics/7565572.stm

Pause the video at 4.49, the time reads 9.3 secs

He started slowing down way before 9.3 secs, he looked to his right at around 8 seconds into the race, so was at about 85 metres into it.... at that moment he would have been doing 10.62 metres per second.... had he kept on going I reckon his time would have been around.... 9.41secs....

Of course my calculations are my own estimations of distances covered and points in time, they also dont take into account his decelerations, mavity, the moon, position of the planets or the lay of dead chickens entrails!

He final time gave him 10.31 metres per second average over the whole 100 metres.
 
One thing to bear in mind is that he is doing the 200m as well and probably didn't want to expend any unnecessary energy. You'd think it wouldn't make much difference but you do see tactics coming into play from atheletes, that's why they often cruise through the heats.
 
Is he taking any banned substances. No.

But he's taking something. They all are.

Caffiene, for example, is allowed (does it still have a max limit?). Linford Christie managed to successfuly argue that his elevated hormone levels were due to Ginseng tea. Celery is supposed to boost natural testosterone. Altitude training is allowed, so is hyperbaric training.

At the end of the day they'll be taking every legal measure to improve things just enough so that they don't test positive for something indirectly.

But really - where do you draw the line between a suppliment and a banned substance? Creatine is allowed, for example, IIRC.
 
Last edited:
They was saying in the studio because of his size it helps a lot. Not many sprinters his height can sprint that well, he has huge legs and powerful so his stride is a lot bigger than most.

I think what gives that away the most is at the start of races hes never out in front its kind of level until his stride gets going, thats when he starts to clear the competition.

For those interested people should check out "bigger faster stronger" its all about drug usage in sports quite eye opening. They talk about blood doping and the ways its done.

- training high altitude (american olympic training ground is)
- sleeping in some special chamber
- taking some tablets
- injecting your own blood the night before the race

The stupid thing is the top 2 are considered legal and are allowed the bottom two are cheating, yet it all does the same :o
 
Last edited:
Bolt would struggle to win the 60m - getting into his stride as it finished.

I think he's redefined what the ideal physique for a sprinter is anyway.
 
The line has been drawn.

Illegal | Allowed

I didn't mean how does the athlete decide. More why does the governing body decide substance or practice x should be banned, when substance or practice y, that have similar effects, should be allowed.
 
What a race he ran. Brilliant. could have gone quicker but cares when you can show-boat and show off like that :D
 
The thing is, I would love to believe he's clean.

However, the only time I have ever seen anyone obliterate the field like that was Ben Johnson's 9.79 which at the time was a similar crazy run!

I guess time will tell, but I can't help feeling Jamaica have got something up their sleeve, something genetic.
 
I think he is clean. Would'nt he hand to do some tests like everyone else before the games and during the games?

I just reckon its his bloody long legs that is the key :p
 
It's usually those you don't initially suspect that end up being the cheats and vice versa.

You have to be a total prat to take drugs and then stand out in a huge way as you're just drawing attention to yourself. Ben Johnson's the perfect example - looked like he'd spent the last year in a body-building boot camp and then took the world record apart in the Olympic final. Might as well have hung a sign around his neck.
 
Even if he isnt clean, what he did was the most amazing moment ive seen in athletics
 
HAh yeah.

Ben Johnson's eyes were popping out of his skull.

Deltoids looked like someone had inflated them too. Bolt's physique is different enough from the others to suggest he may just have a natural advantage. Hopefully it's simply down to him having a long stride and being the first person that tall to get the technique enough to accelerate well at the start.

If he completely nails the technique and runs a perfect 100m race, I don't expect to see his personal best record broken by anyone else in my lifetime.
 
Maybe. I was reading an interview with Bolt a few weeks ago saying it was more important to him to be olympic champion or world champion than to set a world record becuase nobody can take those away from you. Someone could break the world record in a week.

Maybe once he's won everything in sight he'll get more interested in setting records that are just untouchable. It seems to me that he's more the type of character to race against the man rather than the clock just now.
 
From my post in another thread

You can see this in the West Indies and the US, because a lot of black people were descended from slaves. They were bred to be big and strong each generation for 300 years, thus ensuring the continuity of certain genes that influenced this area of their physiology.

In West Africa (and around the world, even), despite being the same people these particular genes are not as much in abundance, thus compared to the population size countries like Nigeria and Ghana produce less top class sprinters.
 
Back
Top Bottom