depends on cost really doesnt it? not even a mutli-billion pound machine can beat a brain so which would be cheaper to use?
depends on cost really doesnt it? not even a mutli-billion pound machine can beat a brain so which would be cheaper to use?
im not the leading man on this technology am ii do not know how to wire a brain into a pc.
im sure though in future times this may and will happen.maybe they will farm the brains or use or ways i dont knoweverything at the end of day comes down to money whether you admit it or not and if the brain can do a better job than a machined part of technology it will be used providing they can use it in a efficient manner.
im not the leading man on this technology am ii do not know how to wire a brain into a pc.
im sure though in future times this may and will happen.maybe they will farm the brains or use or ways i dont knoweverything at the end of day comes down to money whether you admit it or not and if the brain can do a better job than a machined part of technology it will be used providing they can use it in a efficient manner.
I don't even get /why/ you want this to happen - what would be the benefits?
Are you saying that you think that people should be able to upload how to do things ala 'The Matrix' or just so they can carry around there word documents and Crysis saved files in there head?
Rich
Well we are in the matrix right now. Some of us that have broken the system can download things to our brains, for instance i learned karate this morning in 10 seconds.
This is why, in my opinion, you will never see brain-computer direct interfaces (as in wired to the brain) as there is simply too much noise.