Is Sarah Palin just stupid?

TheCenturion

TheCenturion

TheCenturion

Soldato
Joined
18 Mar 2008
Posts
12,751
Now she's accusing Obama of consorting with terrorists! The American people are actually buying this? In a speech earlier this year, she said:
"When he (Obama) is finished saving the world, what will he do after that?"
WTF?!?!
 
Yep, she is just stupid, no other way to describe her low intelligence. I'm sure a lot of Americans will flock to vote for her and McCain.
 
While the attack is ill-advised, and gutter politics at it's best, it is worth looking at the history of the man Obama is accused of associating with before throwing mud too much.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7653132.stm

The man she is accusing him of associating with is Bill Ayers, who cofounded the weatherman, responsible for several confirmed bombings in the very late 60's and early 70's in protest at the vietnam war, some of which did include deaths.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_(organization)#Activities

The problems come with the fact that Obama has had very little association with the man, and also that he has decryed the man's behaviour in the past, rather than that Bill Ayers is not, or was not, a terrorist.
 
I dislike Palin immensely. Even taking politics and her apparent level of intellect out the equation, I still find her incredibly irritating.
 
I wish someone would put the whole republican party into a strong bin liner which is tied securily with good rope and then throw it into the Pacifc Ocean, preferable close to the Mariana Trench. Maybe include a few bricks to be sure they sink to the bottom.
 
Dolph said:
While the attack is ill-advised, and gutter politics at it's best, it is worth looking at the history of the man Obama is accused of associating with before throwing mud too much.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7653132.stm

The man she is accusing him of associating with is Bill Ayers, who cofounded the weatherman, responsible for several confirmed bombings in the very late 60's and early 70's in protest at the vietnam war, some of which did include deaths.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_(organization)#Activities

The problems come with the fact that Obama has had very little association with the man, and also that he has decryed the man's behaviour in the past, rather than that Bill Ayers is not, or was not, a terrorist.
Click to expand...

And at the time Bill Ayers allegedly committed the offence Obama would have been 14 at his oldest and 2 at the youngest.

The "controversy" iirc stems from Obama's position on the board of a charity that Ayers was associated with.
 
Last edited:
The entire election is, to be honest, a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwitch, although Obama is ahead on points for me, it's only as a lesser of two evils idea...

Just like nearly every other election these days, sadly.
 
Dolph said:
The entire election is, to be honest, a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwitch, although Obama is ahead on points for me, it's only as a lesser of two evils idea...

Just like nearly every other election these days, sadly.
Click to expand...

obama is the turd?
 
Dolph said:
The entire election is, to be honest, a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwitch, although Obama is ahead on points for me, it's only as a lesser of two evils idea...

Just like nearly every other election these days, sadly.
Click to expand...

Heh I like that analogy. I do agree though, there will never be a perfect party or politician to vote for... all will have their advantages and disadvantges. The problem Obama has is that he has already made a lot of enemies (according to what i've read) in the senate, chiefs of staff etc with his proposed policies... and those are the guys who really run the country. A president, while powerful, is the figurehead for these people, the ones who've been running the country behind the scenes for decades, and peeing them off before you get into office isn't going to make his life any easier. It certainly didn't make JFK's any easier...
 
Last edited:
neocon said:
yes, im white, what benefit do i get from democrats/liberals being in power?
Click to expand...

Do you not think it would be Dangerous for the Republicans to be in power for another term? It's obvious they have no idea what they're doing and not only are they wrecking the US and its economy they're having an effect on the rest of the world. The sooner they go the better!
 
pedrochop said:
Do you not think it would be Dangerous for the Republicans to be in power for another term? It's obvious they have no idea what they're doing and not only are they wrecking the US and its economy they're having an effect on the rest of the world. The sooner they go the better!
Click to expand...

it's the rest of the world thats out of control

islamic terrorists
chinese aggression
indian over-population
russian aggression

western people need protect themselves otherwise soon we won't exist
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom