If Villa get a point or more against Man UTD - will that be the first weekend in years where at least one of the "big four" haven't won?
If Villa get a point or more against Man UTD - will that be the first weekend in years where at least one of the "big four" haven't won?
Fancy the mancs to win today, their record against Villa is something else.
Pleased that Chelsea drew but we've obviously missed the chance to clear. I'm sure they'll see it the same.
Had a shocking day on the betting, it's not always rosey!
Utd also let three goals in from Hull (and they were well deserved) at OT
Hull are a great side, but Villa have better players all over the park (and are playing at home)
Apart from last week we have struggled for goals - it could easily go either way
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archiv ... sive-teams
"I feel Sunderland adopted a defensive attitude but I cannot judge what the opponents do," he said afterwards. "We have to find a solution to the problems which they give us.
"Today we were a fraction short creativity-wise, we have not really found it. I think you could see the players wanted it but we just lacked a little bit of sharpness. That was maybe down to the fact we gave a lot against Porto on Tuesday night.
"Overall we did today what a team has to do. I'm happy with the last two performances, the only game we were complacent is the Hull game."
Fulham:
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archiv ... od-enough-
"They had a corner and they took advantage from it. That illustrates the first half. We were not sharp enough. We were not first enough on the ball
Hull:
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/reaction
"I believe we had the chances to win the game as you have seen. I feel the commitment was on Hull's side. They fought for 90 minutes and I believe from the start onwards we were not completely switched on to the level that you need to be to win the game.
Stoke:
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archiv ... ed-to-win-
We were not sharp enough to create the chances and conceded two goals on two throw-ins.
And Aston Villa:
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archiv ... nt-enough-
You can make all kinds of explanations but as a team we were not sharp”
Absolute terrible performance from Liverpool. There where so many players who just looked like they couldn't be bothered.
I've also got to say that it was bad management by Benitez. OK Masch and Alonso have both played internationals, and it might be a good idea to rest one of them, however you dont do that if your star midfielder Gerrard is sitting in the stands injured. You just play your best midfielders, its simple.
Alonso when he came on for the wrong person (Masch) changed our attacking completely. However, Keane, Riera, Babel and a tired looking Kuyt simply looked way out of order.
I've given Keane his chance and hes just not good enough for Liverpool. Torres is on a different level and it was only him at the very end that actually had fight in him.
What a waste, especially considering Chelsea drew at Newcastle.
How much was you in for
"It's a flattering result for Manchester City. The attitude was right because we fought very hard. We lacked a bit of maturity to dominate the game. I don't think Man City created a lot. I think we were quite in control of the game. We have no big issues - just the fact we didn't win the game. We have a good attitude, a good spirit. We'll turn it around."
Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger
Is he confusing the teams?![]()
"It's a flattering result for Manchester City. The attitude was right because we fought very hard. We lacked a bit of maturity to dominate the game. I don't think Man City created a lot. I think we were quite in control of the game. We have no big issues - just the fact we didn't win the game. We have a good attitude, a good spirit. We'll turn it around."
Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger
Is he confusing the teams?![]()
Is that what he said or is this a wind up? The man's lost it!