Conspiracy theorist needs to goto Specsavers.

Permabanned
Joined
15 Sep 2006
Posts
4,642
Location
Somewhere in York
WASHINGTON, DC - A noted scientist has just produced proof that the lunar surface was inhabited by intelligent life: a 10-inch angel sculpture embedded in a moon rock.

Geologist Dr. Morris Charles revealed last week that NASA lab workers chipped the angel from one of the rocks brought to Earth by Apollo 11 astronauts 40 years ago, in 1969. Dr. Charles was a NASA scientist himself for 23 years but left the agency in 1987. He still maintains close ties to many of his former colleagues.

“The implications of this figurine are absolutely mind-boggling,” Dr. Charles told reporters. “It means that at one time the moon had an atmosphere conducive to life. And what’s more, it was once home to a sophisticated race of people with a highly refined sense of beauty.”

Source - http://thecrit.com/2009/05/05/200000-year-old-statue-found-on-moon/

So what do you think? Something in this story? If there is, then could this be the proof people have been seeking?
 
I wish I could believe this sort of stuff :( Tinfoil hat brigade I'm afraid.

Where is this mentioned on the NASA site for credibility then?
 
how dodgy does the picture look?

moonstatue.jpg
 
The featured video to the right (if it's the same for everyone) sums up this.
I could give you a few reasons why this is impossible.
 
Last edited:
I just found it interesting, not sure whether or not its real, but even if the possibility, its pretty mind boggling.
 
Most Christians I know are open to the FACT that we were not the first inhabitants of this sector of the galaxy.

One of the quotes from the site, this is where we would be if we didn't pan these types of threads here :p

I just found it interesting, not sure whether or not its real, but even if the possibility, its pretty mind boggling.

You're a complete mental case if you're 50/50 on this.
 
I'm pretty fascinated by claims of antediluvian (before the mythological "flood") civilisations, and some writers have made a pretty compelling (at least intellectually, if not scientifically) case for the plausibility of such societies, but any theory that involves Mars or the Moon can automatically be dismissed as bananas.
 
How do they know its 200k years old and thats not really a long time considering we have had life on earth well belong that, why did the beings on the moon disappear so suddenly and leave no trance.
 
So what do you think? Something in this story? If there is, then could this be the proof people have been seeking?

Saw this story the other day. Very interesting, I speaking to a remote viewer once and he told me he's seen two very large abandoned structures on the dark side of the moon.
 
You're a complete mental case if you're 50/50 on this.

Well there seems to be no proof that is made up, it sounds insane, but you have to keep an open mind. If NASA have it, surely there must be something legit behind it.
 
thecrit.com? What a load of rubbish. A-level physics shows how the moons mavity isn't enough to hold an atmosphere at decent temperatures. Among other strangeness in the article is:

Based on chemical analysis of the metal, geologists estimate the sculpture to be 200,000 years old which means it was made 170,000 years before the human species appeared on Earth.

Humans have been around for more than 30,000 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom