The all encompassing BNP thread - keep all crap in here.

mattheman · 10 Jun 2009 at 19:39

Hatter The Mad said:
http://bnp.org.uk/Constitution 9th Ed Sep 2005.pdf

were does it say about members i cant see it.

Hatter The Mad · 10 Jun 2009 at 19:42

mattheman said:
were does it say about members i cant see it.

Yeah, I knew you wouldn't be able to "see it". Reading must be a pain eh?

"The British National Party represents the collective National, Environmental, Political, Racial, Folkish, Social, Cultural, Religious and Economic interests of the indigenous Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Norse folk communities of Britain and those we regard as closely related and ethnically assimilated or assimilable aboriginal members of the European race also resident in Britain. Membership of the BNP is strictly defined within the terms of, and our members also self define themselves within, the legal ambit of a defined ‘racial group’ this being ‘Indigenous Caucasian’ and defined ‘ethnic groups’ emanating from that Race as specified in law in the House of Lords case of Mandla V Dowell Lee (1983) 1 ALLER 1062, HL."

"We do not have, and will not have, any non-white or Muslim members." http://web.archive.org/web/20070310193246/http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=854

semi-pro waster · 10 Jun 2009 at 19:47

Hatter The Mad said:
Yeah, I knew you wouldn't be able to "see it". Reading must be a pain eh?

I'm pretty sure that is about the fifth time it has been highlighted in this very thread alone but for some reason it still keeps getting questioned, I'm now far more familiar with the BNP site and their Constitution than I've ever wanted to be.

Moley · 10 Jun 2009 at 19:57

Hatter The Mad said:
So you're saying without these millions, David Cameron would be poorly presented when he stands up to speak (anywhere, with or without prep), and would come across as a common thug?

Obviously not, but he may be a little less polished in his presentation skills. All mainstream politicians have "media training" and extensive PR staff working for them - which is why they come across very controlled and well presented in official press conferences and party political broadcasts. This costs money and a lot of it, money which the BNP hasn't had but with their MEP funding may well now be able to afford. I don't agree with the BNP politics but if you're going to attack them, at least attack them over something with a bit more substance than "they have poo adverts".....

Stag · 10 Jun 2009 at 20:14

dirtydog said:
Yes it says it's a party which stands up for indigenous Britons, and thank god they do because someone has to

What is an indigenous Briton? How far back do you have to have ties to these shores?

Hatter The Mad · 10 Jun 2009 at 20:23

Stag said:
What is an indigenous Briton? How far back do you have to have ties to these shores?

Please read the thread, don't make him repeat his definition (he's said it many times) or revisit the debate (which has occurred several times in the same thread

)

Stag · 10 Jun 2009 at 20:24

What page, it's a big thread; I wasn't aware he'd actually answered the 2nd question.

Hatter The Mad · 10 Jun 2009 at 20:33

Stag said:
What page, it's a big thread; I wasn't aware he'd actually answered the 2nd question.

I've just realised a few threads have been merged into one, making it a 99 pager - I don't expect you to "read the thread" huhu. Perhaps dirtydog can enlighten us once again

Stag · 10 Jun 2009 at 20:55

You'll get better odds of Andorra beating England than dirtydog answering a direct question like the one above.

likwid · 10 Jun 2009 at 21:49

Do not think for one second yourself that the BNP are standing up for the views of the majority. While many agree with the view that something need be done about immigration and EU membership, the majority do not agree with the the BNP's manifesto.

As I mentioned previously, the BNP have to canvas some of the poorest housing estates in the country to find people stupid enough to vote for them. If you find yourself among those people then have no doubt, you are either:
- racist
- too stupid to realise that discriminating against race is racism.
- too stupid to comprehend that supporting a racist party is an endorsement of racism

Yes, rattle off all your usual nonsense responses but realise I have not read a single intelligent point put forward by any BNP supporter in this thread. Frankly, not one of you have done anything other than reinforce my view that BNP supporters are small minded, uneducated fools.

Sankari · 10 Jun 2009 at 21:57

likwid said:
Do not think for one second yourself that the BNP are standing up for the views of the majority. While many agree with the view that something need be done about immigration and EU membership, the majority do not agree with the the BNP's manifesto.

As I mentioned previously, the BNP have to canvas some of the poorest housing estates in the country to find people stupid enough to vote for them. If you find yourself among those people then have no doubt, you are either:
- racist
- too stupid to realise that discriminating against race is racism.
- too stupid to comprehend that supporting a racist party is an endorsement of racism

Yes, rattle off all your usual nonsense responses but realise I have not read a single intelligent point put forward by any BNP supporter in this thread. Frankly, not one of you have done anything other than reinforce my view that BNP supporters are small minded, uneducated fools.

/facepalm

Um, mate? I was being sarcastic.

If you'd bothered to check the thread before whacking me with your keyboard, you would have seen that I've been arguing vigorously against the BNP guys all along. I'm also battling them in the Holocaust revisionism thread.

Delvis · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:00

Evangelion said:
/facepalm

Um, mate? I was being sarcastic.

If you'd bothered to check the thread before whacking me with your keyboard, you would have seen that I've been arguing vigorously against the BNP guys all along. I'm also battling them in the Holocaust revisionism thread.

Not everyone reads every thread on this forum you know...So calm down.

EDIT: Hehe battling

4T5 · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:01

likwid said:
Major Lolage.

Evangelion said:
/facepalm

Um, mate? I was being sarcastic.

If you'd bothered to check the thread before whacking me with your keyboard, you would have seen that I've been arguing vigorously against the BNP guys all along. I'm also battling them in the Holocaust revisionism thread.

For the Lolage, For Posterity & for everything that is Holy. Posts like these make baby jesus smile & the sun shine.

[FnG]magnolia · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:03

Does anyone else find dirtydog's over and improper use of smileys far more interesting than his comments? I find myself jumping through his repungent guff to see if he's lent a smiley credence to his nonsense or not; it adds drama to a chore.

p.s. Happy to be reported for this but it is true. It's the most value I deride from his posts

... I mean

Delvis · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:05

[FnG]magnolia;14258838 said:
Does anyone else find dirtydog's over and improper use of smileys far more interesting than his comments? I find myself jumping through his repungent guff to see if he's lent a smiley credence to his nonsense or not; it adds drama to a chore.

p.s. Happy to be reported for this but it is true. It's the most value I deride from his posts ... I mean

Suddenly a crime to smile now as well =/ Christ.

I tend to put smiles in some of my posts, purely to make sure people know I'm not having a go or being angry towards them!

[FnG]magnolia · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:07

Simply saying that his racist comments followed by a smiley are sometimes more interesting than his racist comments without a smiley. What's the difference? You have to read his further racist nonsense to find out! It's a brilliant gimmick!

In case there's any confusion, I think all BNP voters are below scum and I wouldn't **** on them if they were on fire. Smiley.

likwid · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:08

Evangelion said:
/facepalm

Um, mate? I was being sarcastic.

If you'd bothered to check the thread before whacking me with your keyboard, you would have seen that I've been arguing vigorously against the BNP guys all along. I'm also battling them in the Holocaust revisionism thread.

Ok, really sorry about that. It's hard to keep track of who's who.

deuse · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:11

[FnG]magnolia;14258838 said:
Does anyone else find dirtydog's over and improper use of smileys far more interesting than his comments? I find myself jumping through his repungent guff to see if he's lent a smiley credence to his nonsense or not; it adds drama to a chore.

p.s. Happy to be reported for this but it is true. It's the most value I deride from his posts ... I mean

Its a BNP thread not a DD thread..move on

Delvis · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:13

[FnG]magnolia;14258888 said:
Simply saying that his racist comments followed by a smiley are sometimes more interesting than his racist comments without a smiley. What's the difference? You have to read his further racist nonsense to find out! It's a brilliant gimmick!

In case there's any confusion, I think all BNP voters are below scum and I wouldn't **** on them if they were on fire. Smiley.

Hah, fair enough

All personal opinion mind

[FnG]magnolia · 10 Jun 2009 at 22:17

Ok, I'm going to stop bumping this thread now. There are, unless I've lost count, less than 10 posters in this thread who believe the BNP have any credibility. And we're close to 3,000 posts.

I'm sure you can do the maths.

edit : ffs, I forgot the dd (TM) smiley :