Street Fight IV PC-Benchmark Released

Default settings:

Average 203.50 FPS


Same resolution but with max settings/AA/AF etc:

Average 127.26 FPS


E8400 & ATI 4870 512MB
 
Thought I would go all out and see what my aging 3870 could do.

Quite impressed really, everything was on max :D

3633751108_ac417a6a7f_o.jpg


Best thing is the 3870 is overclocked and passive! :cool:
 
ati cards seem to outperform nvidia ones in this game with current drivers. However, it doesnt really matter as performance is great for both brands.
 
It runs pretty good on my laptop.

One observation - The characters during battle are quite a bit smaller than the x360 verison.
 
have it for the 360 but this looks sharper.

SCORE: 12726
AVERAGE: 179.61FPS
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.66GHz
Memory: 8192MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Display Setting: 1920x1200 60Hz 8xAA
 
SDK^ said:
It runs pretty good on my laptop.

One observation - The characters during battle are quite a bit smaller than the x360 verison.
Click to expand...
That's an illusion, becaue they look smaller because the demo doesn't have health bars above and below to fill the screen. they look the same size to me as i have my PS3 hooked up to the same monitor and seem the same size
 
Unbelievable.

I just updated the nvidia gfx drivers from 180.48 to 185.85

I stopped updating them a long time ago when I didnt see any improvement and often things were worse than before. Oh how wrong I was!

With old drivers, 2xAA and everything default, no vsync, I was getting average 55.26 fps.

With these newer drivers, 2xAA with everything HIGH, no vsync, I am now getting average 77.65 fps! With 8xAF the score is pretty much the same!

Really surprised, guess my 9600GT still has some use after all!
 
Tbh.. both ATI and Nvidia cards are performing very good.. capcom have done an excellent optimisation job :)

Seems there is a glitch.. if you alt tab out while running the demo you get a massive improvement:

result4.png


SCORE: 24361
AVERAGE: 428.92FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
Memory: 6134MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Display Setting: 1920x1080 60Hz C16xQAA

LOL

And for ***** and giggles I ran everything at the lowest possible setting:

result5.png


SCORE: 79019
AVERAGE: 608.94FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
Memory: 6134MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Display Setting: 640x480 60Hz

Low - Alt tabbed:

result6.png


SCORE: 123513
AVERAGE: 985.62FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
Memory: 6134MB
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Display Setting: 640x480 60Hz


Can't wait for Resi 5 :D
 
Last edited:
I have tried the latest Forceware drivers and found the following

>>> Forceware 190.15 LEAK
SCORE: 7825
AVERAGE: 93.4FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Ultimate 64bit
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 3.2GHz
Memory: 8GB DDR2 @ 960MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 @ 625c / 1100m / 1300s
Display Setting: 1920x1200 60Hz 4xAA, 16xAF, Max Shadows, Max Quality



Also here's how it looks in each of the art "modes"

Normal (off)
normal.jpg


Ink
ink.jpg


Watercolour
water.jpg


Posterised
poster.jpg
 
An overclock on the GFX card for +25MHz on the core and +50MHz on the shaders results in:

>>> Forceware 190.15 LEAK
SCORE: 8000
AVERAGE: 96.82FPS
OS: Windows Vista™ Ultimate 64bit
CPU: Intel® Core™2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 3.2GHz
Memory: 8GB DDR2 @ 990MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 @ 650c / 1100m / 1350s
Display Setting: 1920x1200 60Hz 4xAA, 16xAF, Max Shadows, Max Quality

I'll drop the clocks back and increase my CPU to 3.3GHz and rerun to see which overclock gives the biggest gain in this game.


Edit:

>>> Forceware 190.15 LEAK
SCORE: 7822
AVERAGE: 93.33FPS
OS: Windows Vista™ Ultimate 64bit
CPU: Intel® Core™2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 3.3GHz
Memory: 8GB DDR2 @ 960MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 @ 625c / 1100m / 1300s
Display Setting: 1920x1200 60Hz 4xAA, 16xAF, Max Shadows, Max Quality

So a CPU overclock (ram too) results in absolutely zero performance difference indicating that the game is scaling very well on quad core but is limited by GFX card power at my screen's native resolution with FSAA (expectedly...).

Funnily enough though even with C16xQAA enabled it still gives 60FPS average :D

Also anyone with a 360 pad can mod the dpad :D


http://video.google.co.uk/videosear...sa=X&oi=video_result_group&resnum=4&ct=title#
 
Last edited:
thought i'd try this on my winxp 8800 gt core2 duo setup, 31.0 fps avg so not bad with the old 163.75 trusty ol drivers.

gave the new 185.85 drivers a go and i get an avg 49.1 fps, huge improvement with all the same settings, and it's the same with all my other games. hats off to nvidia :)

still life in the ol 8800 yet hehehe
 
My 3870 is getting on abit, but the game looks completely playable still with all settings maxed. only slight over clock on 3870 (800/1200) Cat 9.6

SCORE: 5241
AVERAGE: 45.70FPS
OS: Windows Vista(TM) Ultimate
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (3.60GHz)
Memory: 8190MB
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 3800 Series
Display Setting: 1920x1200 60Hz 8xAA
 
dunker said:
xbox 360 pad for windows the best gamepad to get for this?
Click to expand...

Imo no, the d-pad is atrocious. If i were to get a pad i'd look at the saturn USB pads. It's basically the same as the madcatz official street fighter 4 pads but a little smaller and a hell of a lot cheaper.

Avoid the official SF4 pads too, loads of folks tried them in the console section and all of them broke, really poorly made.

The saturn pad i'm referring to is this one btw:

saturnusbcontrollerblac.jpg
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom