NASA releases high res film of moon walk

Status
Not open for further replies.
LizardKing said:
Surely if it was fake then someone involved with it would have leaked something by now.
The chances of keeping 100's of people quite are pretty much nill let alone for 40 years!
The same goes for any other stupid conspirecy theory (Sept 11 etc)!
Click to expand...

LizardKing. :p


They say that less than 100 people actually knew it was faked and the others involved genuinely believed it was real.
 
skippi90 said:
LizardKing. :p


They say that less than 100 people actually knew it was faked and the others involved genuinely believed it was real.
Click to expand...


I cant see less than 100 people being able to fake the moon landing while keeping the other hundreds of people involved out of know from finding out or realising it.
It would probably take more computer power than what was available at the time to fake all the trajectory infomation and what of all the people that followed the radio signals and telescopes?
 
sandman06 said:
what i dont get. why havent they been back

and how can a rocket land vertically ? that defies physics doesnt it
Click to expand...

they have been back :/ about 5 times IIRC.

and what rocket landed vertically on the moon ? surely it was only the lunar lander which landed on the moon ? a device designed and made to land on the moon by some of the cleverest engineers of the time.
 
Oh dear, my Grandad was one of many 1000s of ham radio enthusiasts who followed Apollo 11 all the way to the moon so I'd love to know how NASA faked that.
Now here's the real biggie, who paid the Russians to pretend that America landed on the moon first?
 
exactly !

the russians never even tried calling it fake. they knew it was possible as they wherent all that far off doing it themselves. they landed an unmaned craft on there IIRC
 
"andy" said:
they have been back :/ about 5 times IIRC.

and what rocket landed vertically on the moon ? surely it was only the lunar lander which landed on the moon ? a device designed and made to land on the moon by some of the cleverest engineers of the time.
Click to expand...

yes ive already mention that they went back during late 60- and 70s

apollo 11,12,14,17

im talking recently
 
sandman06 said:
yes ive already mention that they went back during late 60- and 70s

apollo 11,12,14,17

im talking recently
Click to expand...

theres nothing there ? they did all the research they needed. there isnt one reason to go there. its like belgium. just no reason to go back after youve been once and pigged out on chocolate
 
Azagoth said:
More to the point, if Neil Armstrong was indeed the first man to walk on the moon, who was filming him coming down the ladder? ;)
Click to expand...

If you want to try to explain why/how it was filmed it's was just a re-enactment for the benefit of the American Public and people watching around the world and importantly the russians who had already won the race for the first man in space so what else could they do but aim for the moon.

Most likely either they landed, set up the camera then redid it. Or
they landed did all the stuff they had to and either back here on earth it was then filmed in a studio or they came back and redid it in a studio.

Simple fact of the matter is Im sure there was some minor cover-up but mostly for the reasons I stated and again keep in mind this was a big event for america it was to get moral up against the russians, fools probably didnt think through the fact that they cant film the landing properly until someone sets up the camera etc etc but that the public at that time anyway wouldnt think too deeply about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom