Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 5,488
I think, in regards to missing things out, they could of written the films in such a way so that they don't need to miss things out of the last two films for fear of confusing people. I think they could have worked things better, and as I said, shot it almost scene for scene, just do a Lord of the Rings, release extended editions for hardcores like me.
Agreed. I guess the target audience of these films wouldn't mind at all extended versions and scene-for-scene adaptation although having said that I don't really like the LoTR movies and probably couldn't sit through a 3:30 hour DVD/Blu-Ray release for example (depending on subject matter of course).
But also, I think a valid point would be that the long running time suited LoTR which had a decent pace, eventful intervals and action scenes written in and intertwined with the overall story. Harry Potter does not and is basically as follows;
Harry goes to school
Plays some Quidditch
Has some arguments
Talks to Dumbledore
Something happens at the end
And rinse and repeat seven times. Truth is they're probably just not that exciting in visual form, in written text granted Harry's school-days are interesting but unless you have awesome actors and dialogue then its going to seem lacking in film form and possibly even more so with a longer running time. Also, characters like Snape aren't made to seem half as evil as was given the impression in the books.




