Man of Honour
- Joined
- 15 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 28,140
- Location
- Liverpool
Sorry why is this in the news again? Or is this the conclusion of what was going on in courts a few months back? 

Without being rude; you really haven't got a clue, have you?
He's been charged with affray, it hasn't been determined whether he was guilty of it or not. As for those quotes; you just said that a verdict hasn't been given so how the **** are you so sure that the prosecution's version of events is true or not?
....
I'll say it again. You haven't got a clue.
How do you know what Gerrard's attitude was like? As Pigeon said to somebody earlier, were you there? You've made an assumption based on what the prosecution has claimed not what's been proven.
As for the stuff about getting off lightly. I know there hasn't been a conclusion/verdict however the fact that the case has got this far shows that he clearly hasn't got off lightly. I very confident in saying that at worst he'll get a fine because he can afford top lawyers and most importantly because what he's reportedly done doesn't warrant anything more.
I am sure you still won't be able to understand this so I'll make it easy and stick you on ignore.
Liverpool's captain, in court in Liverpool![]()
OK thats ridiculous. As if being a Liverpool player will change the result of a trial just because the courts are in Liverpool.He's a Liverpool player, going through the courts in Liverpool![]()
its just club lighting, bright spotlights right over the bar is very usual, dimmer lighting elsewhere, plus they upped the contrast on the highlighted spot anyway to make it clearer, which slightly distorts the appearance of his top but it IS him.
Whats more, Gerrard, or one of the witness's will easily be able to say who it was on the video, and no one from Gerrards side has come out and made a statement the video is false. Considering you can, quite accurately guess that Gerrard has a team of the best lawyers in the country, against a pretty weak government funded prosecution, it wouldn't be hard for them to come out and do so.
They haven't which leads to the fairly inevitable conclusion that the person the articles and prosecution claim is Gerrard, is infact Gerrard, or someone would have said otherwise.
I mean its fairly simple, the worst lawyer in the country would immediately make a statement that the video is showing someone else, if the best in the country aren't, theres a VERY short list of possibilities why not.
This thread really is stupid. So much hate for one man, that a really poor (and doesn't really show anything) CCTV video doesn't really show anything.
Some people will use any excuse to attack someone.![]()
I am sure you still won't be able to understand this so I'll make it easy and stick you on ignore.
Mr Turner added: "He said he had no intention of having a fight but, when Mr McGee stood up and they started arguing, he believed Mr McGee was about to hit him so he punched him on the side of the head.
"He said Mr McGee punched him back and he hit out at Mr McGee maybe three times but connected only once. On this occasion Steven Gerrard's fists - not his feet - did the talking. This was never self defence in a hundred years."
As I keep saying Gerrard has already admitted hitting him and swinging maybe 3 times for him. Which you can see in that video.
Self defense?
Why are people constantly forgetting to mention he already admitted punching him. The only question is was it in self defense?
The only time a footballer should be drinking is at controlled club functions or at home. Even then they really should be looking after themselves and hitting the booze when their career is over.
I'm not forgetting that, I was talking about the so called 'boxer like' punches that Gerrard threw. I cannot see this in the CCTV from the news.
That's a little extreme.
That's a little extreme.
So is £100kp/w! You expect them to show a little restraint!
Oh dear another Liverpool fan throwing his toys of his pram. Heres the thing everyone is entitled to their opinion as to what the CCTV showed...you dont think hes guilty...thats fair enough whereas Tummy thinks he is..
He should certainly be fined for the way he's dancing at the start of the footage.