He should certainly be fined for the way he's dancing at the start of the footage.
+1
He should certainly be fined for the way he's dancing at the start of the footage.
You clearly have an issue with reading too.
Did I say he's not guilty? I simply pointed out that Tummy has no idea what he's talking about because he doesn't. He doesn't even know what Gerrard's been charged with (actually he says he hasn't been charged at all) and some how can give an opinion on Gerrard's attitude that night based on nothing more than the prosecutions claims.
:dribble:
You don't agree with me because it's your club
Gerrard, reacted badly to a conversation with a man, his friend elbowed him and then Gerrard punched him several times in the face.
The man, didn't appear to do anything to provoke Gerrard. The argument arose from Gerrard not being able to play a song, ie, not getting his own way. Him and his friends reacted badly to it.
What's hard to understand ? I offered my opinion on why I think Gerrard kicked off, and why I also think that a lot of footballers might be shocked for someone to refuse to let them get their own way.
Sorry for saying a bad word against Saint Gerrard![]()
Why did I bother clicking to view your post?
Unless you were there then you don't have a clue as to what or who caused the arguement. You have no idea what happened yet you're making a decision on what happened after hearing 1 side of the story. No doubt Gerrard's defense will claim that the DJ provoked Gerrard and like Hinchy says in Loki's thread, it wouldn't be unusual for a Footballer to be targetted by some idiot trying to make a name for himself.
I don't know what happened which is why I haven't given an opinion, you on the other hand are talking nonsense, as usual.
Why did I bother clicking to view your post?
Unless you were there then you don't have a clue as to what or who caused the arguement. You have no idea what happened yet you're making a decision on what happened after hearing 1 side of the story. No doubt Gerrard's defense will claim that the DJ provoked Gerrard and like Hinchy says in Loki's thread, it wouldn't be unusual for a Footballer to be targetted by some idiot trying to make a name for himself.
I don't know what happened which is why I haven't given an opinion, you on the other hand are talking nonsense, as usual.
....
I have no problem with people having a difference of opinion to me. However you are saying things as if you know them for certain when you have no idea what happened.
And again, I haven't given an opinion on what happened because I don't know what happened.
You seem to quite clearly have issue with my opinion, why don't you offer yours on what happened ?
'cause it looked like one dude refusing to give the cd player up, gets beat up because it's Gerrard and he should be able to get his own way.
Sky Sports News reported that Gerrard has said not guilty and his friends have all said Guilty to affray? might have miss heard, sure that's what it said.
Doesn't really look from the CCTV like it's the guy trying to get something from Gerrard, it's Gerrard going behind the bar where the CD player is and then with his mate following it up afterwards by the looks of things.
I don't think you can blame the fact he's a footballer he should know better blah blah blah
The fact is if I was in a boozer and some fool was swinging I would knock him out as well, it all boils down to who threw the first punch, if it was the fella then fair play to Gerrard.
If it was Gerrards mate and then Gerrard leathered him then he should go down and be branded with the word PUSSY on his ever decreasing forehead.
Are you having a laugh now? I have no idea what happened so how can I give an opinion?
Why does it look like Gerrard started the arguement? Because that's what the prosecution has claimed? Will you change your mind when Gerrard's defense then claim that the DJ was the one that became aggressive?
All the CCTV tells you is that an arguement broke out between Gerrard and the DJ. Unless you were there then I don't know how you can tell who or what caused the arguement.
As for the last part; I explained that in the other thread. There were 2 incidents.
I don't know why people are arguing the side of Gerrard's party, whatever happened, they were a gang and surrounded and beat up one guy, that's pretty harsh really.
I dont know why anyones arguing at all to be fair, it's in court!