What would you consider "high mileage"?

Soldato
Joined
29 Jun 2004
Posts
12,957
Obviously it depends on each car. You don't expect 150k miles on a Peugeot 107 but you might expect it on a Mondeo.

A lot of people seem to want to avoid the psycological 100k barrier. I don't consider 100k high at all. I'd start to show a cause for concern at around 140k, petrol or diesel.

Luckily for people like me who don't find 100k + mileage high it means cars tend to be a lot cheaper ;)

What say you?
 
About 350k kilometers. Around that they start getting problems...

Under 200k is nothing imo (for subcompact ( golf/focus etc) or bigger classes).

Though it depends on the car, on city cars I'd consider 100k A lot. Because, as the name says, they're more likely to be ragged about in town, rather than cruised with on a straight&flat motorway.
 
Last edited:
For stuff like Volvo's I wouldn't even consider 350k high, seeing a lot of them are up for sale with 400k or 450k+ kilometers here.
I'd usually trust bigger cars more with a higher mileage than small cars.
 
I consider my Civic high mileage, at 97k. Doesn't mean it's ready for the scrap yard, but its high mileage.
 
I just picked up a '97 3500 V6 Mitsubishi Pajero for £900, has 131k on the clock. Quite a few bushes need changing and other bits doing to it, but the engine is fine. Stupidly quick for a 4X4.
 
The Mini is on 80k after 17 years. I'd consider that fairly low milage compared to age, but not a "low milage".
 
I consider over 165-170k to be high mileage now.

Although saying that it really depends on the car. I've seen over 350k on a S-Class Merc used by a Limo firm.
 
Depends car to car... what your looking for etc

For some reason 100k sticks in my mind... but as said this could be classed as high on a 57plate, but below average for a p reg or something.
 
For most cars, history suddenly goes patchy over 100k miles. Third party warranties won't cover cars over 100k, most authorized dealers will not sell them from their courtyard. Most advertising pages have it as the last filter - "less than 100k". That's the magical number. Retirement age.

I drove Subaru Outback with 119k on the clock last weekend. Beautiful car. Chain driven boxer 6 pot, pulled like a dream. But the only owner had it serviced for the last time at authorized dealers around 91k. Paid almost £600 to prepare the car for the next 100k and... never returned there again. Suddenly, one day, as he was driving on his way to work, the cars computer clocked 100,000 miles. He heard fanfares, thunderbolt and lightening and the car became banger, right there, in front of his eyes. It turned old car. Don't get me wrong, the car drove fine, it idled fine, it felt fine and I could probably trust it. But the previous owner, the only owner, who never skipped one oil change in eight odd years, one day had a lapse of perception, and the car I sat in, did 28,000 miles pushing the same oil, breathing through the same filters. It became a banger, because its owner believed the clock, not his enjoyment of it or approach to ownership dictated what his car trully was.
I walked away.

And it's not only affecting the "cheap" cars. Two weeks ago, 6 years old 5 series BMW. Advertised with full service history. Stamps go up to 98k, then bunch of oil change receipts from Kwik Fits and Joe Garage's. 30,000k+ done with just basic oil changes. And some shmuck with usb cable resetting service warnings. "Why wasn't it serviced at indie BMW garage?". "As the car got older I couldn't justify the cost of £80 an hour garages". And yet he still wants 7 grand for it. He did £25 oil change and probably paid with local newspaper vouchers, because the meter struck 100k. Well, that's 161k in meterics, what you are going to do now monkey boy, start feeding it with sunflower oil from tesco?

So it's not that I don't trust high mileage cars. I don't trust owners. Anything over 100k without proper, clean, meticulous history, is just not for me. I'd rather go, pick 10 years old Japanese import, with some silly town miles and every panel fresh, clean and garaged. Older with less miles, rather than newer with intergalactic mileage and unknown cam belt interval.
 
Last edited:
I consider 100k to be high mileage as many others, doesn't mean I won't touch a car over that though.

Clio is currently creeping up to 95k atm and the engine pulls strong, burns zero oil and is in good health as is most of the other running gear.

Will just require a bit more attention when servicing for it to continue on to the next milestone - 150k if I have it that long but I do intend to run it to the ground one way or the other.
 
I used to consider 90-100k high mileage, but now my little Clio (1999, 1.6 petrol) is sitting on 164k and is still running strong - high mileage, but still good. Still get 40+ to the gallon

Not a thing has ever needed touching on the engine (timing belt obv.) Suspension and brakes have all been replaced, and the gearbox and clutch wore out at 130k

Still a fun car to drive through the moors to work every day

Most important is, it has been correctly serviced. so Service History is more imortant than mileage to me nowadays
 
150k - 200k Miles for a car depending on size of both the vehicle & engine.

700k - 900k km for an HGV*.

*Scania, Volvo & Mercs add another 100k+ with ease!
:D

Just numbers on an odometer imo, overall condition is far more important.
 
Last edited:
I have a 1991 BMW E32 730i se (mint condition may I add) FSH 2 owners from new 126000 miles and its like a new car.

I also run a taxi firm and if you service your car right you should get 200-250 without major problems (clutch and brake disc come under serviceing)

Its all down to how you drive the car and how you take care of the car !
 
I would say 150k + is fairly high milage, but as R420 said, it depends on the car and the engine. Big lazy V8's will feel a lot less 'used' at 200k miles than a 4 pot. Mine feels virtually new and has done nearly 77k miles ...so just about run in now :D
 
Back
Top Bottom