Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 8,725
- Location
- UK
This is a man who gave support to the IRA, he was no lover of Britain or our interests.
Find an example of him giving support to the IRA, other than not denouncing them.
This is a man who gave support to the IRA, he was no lover of Britain or our interests.
And we, sir, are not American. So it can kindly **** off out tv. A 30s clip is more than enough.
Some of these idiots responding to Senator Kennedys death have no conception of the hopes that were raised in people all over the world when Jack Kennedy was made president.It was bigots like some of the respondents today that helped to bring about the conditions that led to both Jack and Robert Kennedys murders.
Most of the anti-Kennedy respondents today are only doing because of the role he played in the IRA ceasefire,they would rather the campaign had carried on rather than give credit where it is due.
All of the Kennedy brothers had there faults but in the long term as politicians the good they brought about far outweighs there sins.
I only wish we had 3 like them in our own political system.
Never understood all the fuss about the Kennedys, tbh
The Kennedy aura is grossly overstated and does not pass the "So what?" test.
"Man repeats speech written for him by someone else." OK, So... what exactly am I supposed to be looking at here? Still can't find a "wow" factor.
Whilst I agree charisma has a lot to do with it (Obama, Hitler, King etc..), I think a lot more behind the power of a speech is the speech itself, rather than the delivery.Are you suggesting that if someone else was to read MLK's "I have a dream" speech, it would have the same impact?
![]()
GQ said:Even a partial listing of the major bills in whose passage Kennedy has played a part is impressive. Whether you admire them or not, these are the measures that transformed—mostly liberalized—America in our time: the first Immigration Reform Act; the Voting Rights Act and its extensions; the Freedom of Information Act; the Gun Control Act; the Campaign Financing Reform law; the Comprehensive Selective Service Reform Act; the Eighteen-Year-Old Vote law; the Occupational Safety and Health Act; the War on Cancer bills; the recodification of federal criminal laws; the Bilingual Education Act; the Fair Housing Acts; the Age Discrimination Act; the Airline and Trucking Deregulation bills; the Job Training Partnership Act; the South African sanctions; and the Grove City Civil Rights Restoration Act.
Far more than either of his brothers, who were lackluster senators, Kennedy, over the past three decades, has been responsible for changes in the complexion of this country and in the lives of its citizens. He has been an ally of blacks, American Indians, the poor, the sick, the aged, the mentally ill, starving refugees worldwide and immigrants. He has been an outspoken liberal, unafraid to take the controversial positions—on issues such as busing, abortion, gun control, the Vietnam War (late but forcefully), the nuclear freeze and capital punishment—that other senators clearly avoided.
Oh don't troll.So the only reason you dislike the coverage is that it includes foreigners?
Well it would be a start. If they then cover something which is both newsworthy and that the British people care about, it would be even better.And you'd rather they show 'anything', as long as it's British right?
With your straw men and your trolling, perhaps you should look closer to home.Good God. You get less subtle by the day.
So err, not found anything?Find an example of him giving support to the IRA, other than not denouncing them.
Oh we'll just google for it shall we? As if there is going to be a breadcrumb trail.So err, not found anything?
Is this the same Edward "Ted" Kennedy that gave support to the terrorist IRA during the 1980s and 1990s? Is this the same Ted Kennedy who routinely greeted the supporters and masterminds of IRA terrorism on St Patrick's Day in the USA? Is this the same Edward Kennedy who in 1971 compared the British military presence in Northern Ireland to America's unpopular involvement in Vietnam, a slight difference being that Vietnam was not part of America whilst Northern Ireland is part of the UK and the majority population want to remain that way. Is this the same Edward Kennedy who called for the immediate withdrawal of the British army from Northern Ireland claiming that Protestants who could not accept a united Ireland "should be given a decent opportunity to go back to Britain", even though they were born and raised in Northern Ireland? I could go on and I could bring up Chappaquiddick and wonder why Ted Kennedy gets a free pass on his involvement in the death of an innocent woman whilst a conservative US politician in a similar scandal would never be allowed back into public life, but I won't. I will just point out that the day anyone should take seriously the words of Edward Kennedy on any matter of terrorism or of safe driving has not yet come.
I've complained to the BBC via their website and I would advise anyone else who finds their coverage offensive to do likewise:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/forms
Oh don't troll. Well it would be a start. If they then cover something which is both newsworthy and that the British people care about, it would be even better.
Why on earth would anyone find the BBC coverage offensive?