Athletic women. Not all bad.
She was 15 when that was taken, just a fyi...was a bit of a fuss about it when it was posted in another forum some years back.
Are you put off by muscular/athletic women?
- Thread starter Buffman
- Start date
She was 15 when that was taken, just a fyi...was a bit of a fuss about it when it was posted in another forum some years back.
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 144
First girl is a little too muscular for my liking, but I would be being quite picky about it, she seems nice enough. Well-toned but not so muscular would be ideal really.
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 13,300
- Location
- Near Winchester
I wouldn't mind a roll in the hay, the extreme bodybuilder excluded.
I'm actually a member of the forum which was mentioned in the times over it, however I didn't recall any issue over the legality from an underage sense (and some of the comments would have been highly volatile had she been under the age of consent in the uk). I've had a quick look and the few sites i've looked at seem to think that photo was taken at age 17.
however i may be wrong. so cheers for the heads up
I'm actually a member of the forum which was mentioned in the times over it, however I didn't recall any issue over the legality from an underage sense (and some of the comments would have been highly volatile had she been under the age of consent in the uk). I've had a quick look and the few sites i've looked at seem to think that photo was taken at age 17.
however i may be wrong. so cheers for the heads up
Ah OK. 17 is OK then, legally. It was a few years ago, and the forum i saw the fuss on is American, so she'd have been a minor. I guess anything over 16 is OK here.
Just to answer the original OP
There is a huge difference in my eyes between muscle women and fittness girls. i vast majorty in this thread are fittness girls and are super hot, and yes i would be previlaged to date them. Proper muscle women however are a turn off and i don't find it attractive.
There is a huge difference in my eyes between muscle women and fittness girls. i vast majorty in this thread are fittness girls and are super hot, and yes i would be previlaged to date them. Proper muscle women however are a turn off and i don't find it attractive.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Feb 2006
- Posts
- 3,524
^^^^ i agree with that but she looks far better than most would because her face is very pretty and she has flawless skin
yes i watched it in HD
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 20,802
- Location
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
No bad, but the face does look a little manly! I still would tho!
she = incredibly hot. (although if there was ever an argument she'd beet me to a pulp
massively muscular to the point they look like a man after facial surgey
http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/6480/femalebodybuilerssexyor.gif[]
Scary :([/QUOTE]
This really....
The one in the OP is amazingly hot.. and fine but when you get any more muscular than that, then you start getting nightmares imo.
A friend of mine, a serious body builder and a rather hulking presence, gets loads of grief from his mates in the USAF due to his choice in women. He likes his women to be, to put it politely, like shaved Gorillas!
I can say this safely knowing that I wont be seeing him for sometime, so he can't bloody headlock me again, as he's currently directing air power onto targets in Afghanistan.
I can say this safely knowing that I wont be seeing him for sometime, so he can't bloody headlock me again, as he's currently directing air power onto targets in Afghanistan.
Muscles are great (within limits)
I prefer women to be fit, rather than the overweight, smoking, drinks that can be seen, puking up on street corners on Friday/Saturday nights.
A point of note about the lady from the original post - she isnt particularly muscular. She has a very low body fat, which is bringing out the tone. Stand her next to a "normal" woman and you will see that she is of similar size, with most of the fat stripped away. So overall, she is probably smaller than a similar sized woman with higher body fat.
The picture of the bodybuilder in the 3rd post is that of a genuinely large woman - totally different to that from the original post. It would be interesting to see what she looks like when she isnt in competition form (she is obviously at her lowest body fat level in that pic, for competition purposes).
Another point is that most women will never have muscles as large as most men. So unless you are matchstick thin or have high bodyfat and low muscle content, you don't have to worry about the woman having bigger muscles than you.
Kelly Sotherton is nice.
I prefer women to be fit, rather than the overweight, smoking, drinks that can be seen, puking up on street corners on Friday/Saturday nights.
A point of note about the lady from the original post - she isnt particularly muscular. She has a very low body fat, which is bringing out the tone. Stand her next to a "normal" woman and you will see that she is of similar size, with most of the fat stripped away. So overall, she is probably smaller than a similar sized woman with higher body fat.
The picture of the bodybuilder in the 3rd post is that of a genuinely large woman - totally different to that from the original post. It would be interesting to see what she looks like when she isnt in competition form (she is obviously at her lowest body fat level in that pic, for competition purposes).
Another point is that most women will never have muscles as large as most men. So unless you are matchstick thin or have high bodyfat and low muscle content, you don't have to worry about the woman having bigger muscles than you.
Kelly Sotherton is nice.
Do you actually mean he fancies gorillas/monkeys or are you being facetious with your wording?