[TW]Fox;14877208 said:It really isn't, its an embarrasment to the BMW range![]()
Worse, in your opinion, than the 316i?
[TW]Fox;14877208 said:It really isn't, its an embarrasment to the BMW range![]()
[TW]Fox;14876413 said:Yea but most people who need to ask the internet about 1.6 litre BMW's do not need a fast car. They are not into fast cars and their idea of a fast car is their mates Golf TDI which 'really flies'. Therefore why saddle themselves with huge running costs for no benefit?

Then drop the retarded milage and age restrictions and get a well equipped car instead.
my sister and i tell me to go for the 1st one and insurance is cheaper
How about you ignore the rubbish spouted from a womans mouth, as women know sweet FA about cars.
If you take heed of this advice then you may as well cut your danglies off and live in your room with World of Warcraft forever.
Looking at those 2, I'd go for the 120d cause of the engine - however there are FAR better cars that can be had for that kind of money (even a 330ci!).
Put it this way, a car might have lower miles but it might have spent those miles doing short trips in town that causes greater wear to the car, I'd rather have a car that's done more miles but cruising down the motorway. Cars don't magically fall apart at 100,000 miles ya know.
I have noticed that the budget has increased as well. I am guessing this is because the budget is actually a monthly payment?
Get a cheaper car with better spec, with lower monthly payment, or shorter repayment schedule. You'll save money that way.
no. one off full payment. I dont like finance. bmw's rate is stupid.
no. one off full payment. I dont like finance. bmw's rate is stupid.