Of course we do, a man on the interent told us so it must be true
Do you really think the cameras around the Pentagon all take grainy, blurry, low res, one frame per second footage?
Do you agree, something massive is about to happen ?
- Thread starter stinka
- Start date
Do you really think the cameras around the Pentagon all take grainy, blurry, low res, one frame per second footage?
Source?
Before I trawl google for links for you, please answer this: do you dispute that the authorities confiscated CCTV footage from the local area which showed the incident?
You really are quite the internet conspiracy theorist arn't you DD as soon as evidence came up to disprove one of your claims you suddenly switch topic, stick your fingers in your ears and go "lalalalala" till it goes away
I thought all those who believe the official line on 9/11 are the conspiracy theorists
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 4,793
- Location
- London
You really are quite the internet conspiracy theorist arn't you DD as soon as evidence came up to disprove one of your claims you suddenly switch topic, stick your fingers in your ears and go "lalalalala" till it goes away
Seems a common trait with conspiracy theorists. Don't bother addressing the debate and questions posed and instead reply with other questions without conceding points.
I thought all those who believe the official line on 9/11 are the conspiracy theorists
So are you still saying passports can't survive plane crashes?
I like your use of language. Keep making out that only those questioning the official version of events are conspiracy theorists, when in fact the official version is itself a conspiracy theory.
People have fallen out of aeroplanes and survived, so anything is possible. On the balance of probability, a plane disintegrating in a jet fuel fireball near the top of a 400 metre skyscraper however, isn't particularly likely to result in the passport from one of the alleged hijackers to neatly present itself at ground level, fully intact. But anything is possible eh?
In your opinion.
No, it is fact. The official version of events is that a conspiracy took place to carry out the 9/11 attacks.
Also did you miss post 183?
like passports routinely surviving plane crashes you mean?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8151327.stm
5 seconds in.
they didn't just find 1 passport they found a few.
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/07/15/iran.plane.crash/index.html
The height of the building will have only increased the chance of the passport surviving as it more directions to travel to be thrown from the blast.
Or are the Iranians in the plot as well?
But don't let evidence get in your way
It is not fact. And yes I contest that.
Hang on, so you are saying that 9/11 was not a conspiracy?
You must be saying that one person carried it out alone then, yes?
No???
Oh dear
http://www.infowars.net/articles/may2006/170506Pentagon_videos.htm
hahaha that site is quality
http://www.infowars.net/articles/september2009/170909Psyops.htm
Obama's speeches are mind control
http://www.infowars.com/barack-obama-the-naked-emperor
the sites forums is also awesome with it's own sub forum for
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=344.0
The US govt's own website, is a conspiracy theorist website, because it contends that 9/11 is a conspiracy.
Will you read the link and the documents therein, or will you just choose to attack the source rather than the content
The US govt's own website, is a conspiracy theorist website, because it contends that 9/11 is a conspiracy.
Will you read the link and the documents therein, or will you just choose to attack the source rather than the content
Clearly the source. the concept of a global deceit about the true nature of the 9/11 attacks has never held much interest for me. Those who pursue the matter, however, are much more interesting. It's like poking a loose tooth, or throwing rocks at a bee hive. I just can't help myself.
True story though, pretty much anything I say on this particular topic should be discarded as antagonistic and sourceless.
I think it was Skeletor.
the planes would not have been at 35000 ft when the calls were made. 35 000 ft is cruising altitude and these planes were certainly not a cruising altitude when they were being lined up to smash into the WTC 1 and 2. A lot of the calls were logged as happening minutes before the crashes and a lot of the calls were also registered from GTE airphones
read this to see why it actually is possible to make mobile calls at altitude
http://www.911myths.com/html/mobiles_at_altitude.html
also the distances they quote are not 2000ft as you stated (without any proof) so as you see it wuld have been feasable for these phone calls to ocur