Get your best keyboards ready
- Thread starter SexyGreyFox
- Start date
.
Many posts like this in this thread, I would put it down to a chemical imbalance.
you cant condone anything a sicko like him would do to his daughter, or anyone else for that matter
...but then you have fruitloops coming out with dodgee comments like those, would you like it if someone did this to your kids?
i figured not
...but then you have fruitloops coming out with dodgee comments like those, would you like it if someone did this to your kids?
i figured not
No, but anyone doing something like that is obviously sick, literally - ie. mentally ill. And as such are more in need of treatment in a secure hospital rather than being tortured or attacked. A civilised society treats sick people, it doesn't torture them - this isn't Afghanistan.
What worries me is the large group of people in this thread who seem to think it is socially more acceptable to advocate the use of torture (and ironically, someone suggested rape) than to raise a joke on the matter.
"Attack fire with fire for best results, it's the civilised way!"
"Attack fire with fire for best results, it's the civilised way!"
because our country doesn't torture people does it? Hang on....
As a first reaction almost everyone has the urge of retribution of some sort, and I think it is natural as it's an emotional response. That's the way we are hardwired to respond to such shocks. Don't forget that we are not as civilised as we like to believe, we are still animals to a large percentage. Just because we can think logically and empathise it does not necessarily mean that we are benevolent spirits full of kindness - simply because otherwise incidents like the one on the article would never happen.
However once someone cools down they can obviously observe that the individual who committed this atrocity is ill beyond doubt. The way to treat ill people is to try and make them well, not punish them or act revenge on them. That is why there is a difference to whether you do something with intent or not. That is also why a judges job is so difficult and we - as a society - have let the job of judging to a few select individuals (well, all this sounds nice hypothetically, I doubt of its real application considering the judges I've seen/known).
So yes, the act is unthinkable and brutal. The individual needs help. The question is, can we rehabilitate him? Do we have the means yet to do something like that? If we can't rehabilitate him (as I suspect) what do we do?
However once someone cools down they can obviously observe that the individual who committed this atrocity is ill beyond doubt. The way to treat ill people is to try and make them well, not punish them or act revenge on them. That is why there is a difference to whether you do something with intent or not. That is also why a judges job is so difficult and we - as a society - have let the job of judging to a few select individuals (well, all this sounds nice hypothetically, I doubt of its real application considering the judges I've seen/known).
So yes, the act is unthinkable and brutal. The individual needs help. The question is, can we rehabilitate him? Do we have the means yet to do something like that? If we can't rehabilitate him (as I suspect) what do we do?
I think execution is the only reasonable solution so as not to affect the future genepool with his twisted , moronic children. If you think about it, it's probably the best solution for him AND humanity. I don't fancy his chances in society after this crime and we certainly don't need any more retards like him wandering the streets.
So I say terminate him in a relatively painless way for the sake of us and him.
Last edited:
Yeah right , and let tax payers continue to pay for him to be kept in a secure ward with 3 meals a day, xbox, pool tables etc. Sounds more like a reward for someone like this rather than a punishment. He probably didn't even get 3 meals a day at home.
Death penalty is more expensive due to the cost of appeals.