Do you acknowledge that it does occur and therefore that your 'stormfront' jibe was uncalled for?
http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&sour...&btnG=Google+Search&meta=&fp=38c542da47a26377
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/africa/12/10/infant.rape/
Get your best keyboards ready
- Thread starter SexyGreyFox
- Start date
Do you acknowledge that it does occur and therefore that your 'stormfront' jibe was uncalled for?
http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&sour...&btnG=Google+Search&meta=&fp=38c542da47a26377
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/africa/12/10/infant.rape/
Hardly enough punishment for the crime in my opinion. Sterilisation should be mandatory for any person that rapes their own child.
I acknowledge that it occurs, but I don't think it's as prevalent as you're implying. I'm also not sure how relevant it is to the discussion given that child sexual abuse for the hell of it is a bit different to child sexual abuse on the mistaken belief that it cures aids, but I've not thought that through so let's not argue that point.
As for the stormfront thing... I'm probably still cross with whichever chap it was earlier speculating that the culprit in this case was black for no good reason.
My point was based around your statement that execution would be more expensive than long term incarceration. When you add up the amount of money it will take for his potential offspring to be in and out of counselling/jail then a bullet to skull seems an awful lot cheaper.
I thought you said your intention was to stop them breeding in future, not to punish them.
Stop them breeding by executing them. Is execution not punishment ?
I have no idea how much it occurs. I brought this up purely in response to dmpoole who posted to say that (basically) only whites rape children, which is far from true.
I didn't see that but I agree that sort of comment isn't helpful.
So then you are proposing to kill him for crimes his children might commit. How absurd. Your son might be the next Hitler, should we kill you?
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2007
- Posts
- 5,581
- Location
- London
i have been lurking for a while but i do like your talk of execution
but we cant call it execution, its too agressive, we have to convey that killing mentally ill people etc is to prevent them from suffering, that being awake for them is painfull or just CRUEL!, that way it can be socially acceptable, putting them out of their misery so to speak
I'm not sure whether you're being satirical or serious.
You are twisting my words again. I first thought you to be a fairly intelligent chap but am quickly realising the contrary. Kill him for the crimes HE committed , the fact he will never be able to have any more children is just a by-product and a blessing.
Why kill him when locking him up for life is both cheaper and has the same result as far as reoffending goes?
Because prisons these days are a joke. He would likely have a far better life inside playing pool and swapping porn with other like minded pedo's than he would scratching a living selling crack and robbing car stereos.
Do you think it is humane to murder mentally ill people?
Have you served time in prison?
Mentally ill people , or any people for that matter who commit such heinous crimes against the most vulnerable members of our society.
So you want to kill him to punish him and not to stop him reoffending?
Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
These stories always get me going..
