Associate
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2009
- Posts
- 1,505
Read here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8408760.stm
So what aren't we meant to know?
Borich
So what aren't we meant to know?
Borich
UK injunction granted over golfer Tiger Woods
- Thread starter borich_planner
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 12,957
Why didn't they call him Lion Woods? Or Elephant Woods? Why Tiger?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2009
- Posts
- 1,505
Who cares? He has messed up his marriage and slept around, it isn't exactly "public's right to know" stuff. And if it is that juicy and that salacious that you just have to know then the internet will have it all anyway.
That he's been taking marital advice from that other great black American sportsman, Orenthal James Simpson.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 5,463
- Location
- Frack off, nosey
Rumour mill reckons it's apparently nude photos they're hiding?
Of little boys?
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 5,463
- Location
- Frack off, nosey
no, photographs of Tiger Woods - in the nip. Not sure who'd want to see them though :/
Probably just a rumour. Or them taking precautions in case something like that might exist.
linky
Probably just a rumour. Or them taking precautions in case something like that might exist.
linky
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 5,060
- Location
- In the ether
Weird so he's spent a fortune on lawyers to get the UK press to publish pictures that don't exist. Maybe he hit his head in that car crash :/
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 15 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 28,140
- Location
- Liverpool
Wonder if he's going to follow scientology then..
Deleted member 68110
Deleted member 68110
F'ing Judge Eady again. Private Eye readers will know how he's fighting a one-man war against that universal evil, freedom of speech. What a 'tard.
You can't be serious? Only the first billionaire sportsman, earned an estimated $110m last year, and Sporting Icon.
Gatorade, although they claim it's not related.
Considering what the injunction is about I don't really see an issue with it. Just because he is a celebrity does that mean he is no longer entitled to any right to privacy? Naked pictures of Tiger Woods is hardly a story that falls under "public's right to know".
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2007
- Posts
- 3,317
- Location
- Cognac, France
In my opinion if you make absolutely tons of money by being shoved into peoples faces (marketing, advertising etc.) then if you're found to be flawed then that should also be in the public domain.
You denounce all rights of privacy when your public image allows you to gain millions & millions.
You denounce all rights of privacy when your public image allows you to gain millions & millions.