The future of desktop pc's

PCs still whip consoles for gaming. Keyboard + 7-button programmable mouse > those stupid piddly little controllers (are they deliberately designed to be awkward and uncomfortable?) while the PC's vast processing power will always outperform any console on the market.

As for laptops... why would I want to squint at a 15 inch screen when I can enjoy the delights of full 1080p goodness on my 24 inch monitor? And hey, let's talk about storage! Three internal HDDs (average PC) vs one (laptop). No competition.
That sounds more like your hands and eyes are the problem :p

I imagine in 5-10 years when Australia gets the 'proper internet' you'll find stuff like cloud storage quite useful too :p
 
I don't know anyone with a desktop irl and its been this way for about 2-3 years now, everyone who had them including myself sold up and bought a laptop when BF2 started showing its age, that's the last bit of PC gaming any of us did, for me it was about space, with a desktop you need a desk, speakers and so on, i had all that taking up half of my room when a nice little laptop sat on the table will do.

Can you sit back and watch full HD movies on you're laptop with a good sound system to round it off? No?
 
One big reason for Desktop PC's; Heat Management.
You can hardly fit a high end graphics card and CPU on a Netbook without creating too much heat. Desktops provide space necessary to dissapate the heat with big fans.
 
I wonder if we'll ever see Computers built into HDTVs. That'd be pretty awesome, and I'm sure that would begin the fading out of normal desktop machines

You've already got them.

HP for example have the touchsmart range which have everything built into a HD screen, plus you a tv tuner, a HDMI input & touchscreen control. Quite pricey though.

I still prefer to use my desktop for anything that needs decent control. I'll use my netbook for browsing the web but I wouldn't use a laptop or netbook for work.
 
For gaming the quality of console graphics [...] is getting very good indeed

Just no.

They rarely render above 1280x720 and even at that struggle to match the details, textures, effects and anti aliasing and filtering a PC can manage at resolutions much much higher.

For some games like Modern Warfare 2 they can't even render at 1280x720, they have to scale up from something like 1066x600. That is not 'very good indeed', that is downright awful frankly.
 
I'm wondering when wireless HDMI is going to appear - it's good to (about bloody time) to have a protocol that carries HD video and sound together, so wireless it and you'd be looking at a pretty handy set-up.
 
Last edited:
The desktop OC won't ever properly die. Desktops will probably get sleeker and obviously faster but the tower itself will remain for a long time and one of the biggest plus points of it being connectivity and expansion.

I'm wondering when wireless HDMI is going to appear - it's good to (about bloody time) to have a protocol that carries HD video and sound together, so wireless it and you'd be looking at a pretty handy set-up.

Wireless HD sending is already here, among the top units is something like this although that will cover most home requirements multimedia wise you could get cheaper units that stream solo etc.

Oh yeah, PC's? come on people!
 
Aye, I'm sure I saw that in a gadget catalog, if it got taken up en masse and became as ubiqitous as say, Wi-Fi it would be interesting :)
 
That sounds more like your hands and eyes are the problem :p

O rly? Try playing WoW on a console. Oh wait - you can't. :D

I imagine in 5-10 years when Australia gets the 'proper internet' you'll find stuff like cloud storage quite useful too :p

For some people, I guess. I'd never use it. Looking forward to that 100mb national broadband network, though. :)

Not sure about that bit. I don't think my PC CPU could teach much to my PS3 CPU.

A direct comparison might be difficult due to the different architecture, but I strongly doubt that a PS3 could compete with a decent desktop PC in real terms. I run my games on a full HD monitor at 1920x1200 with AA. Suck on that, PS3!
 
Last edited:
Some experts suggest the distant future will see everything in the "Cloud", where big data centers store data, run software, games etc, so all you need is Net access plus screen, keyboard and mouse.
 
Desktops are popular on forums like these because they are easily upgradable - something that's much more complicated on a laptop (or games console for that matter).

I think we will continue to see a convergence of communication/multimedia technology, so the boundaries between mobile phones, PDAs and netbooks will become greyer and greyer. At some point I would envisage us basically having our mobile as a our main PC, with the ability connect peripherals and stream to other devices.

Things like voice recognition and touchscreen surely must expand to until we reach a point where your basic computing functions that are used by your average man on the street can all be done without a keyboard and mouse.
 
Some experts suggest the distant future will see everything in the "Cloud", where big data centers store data, run software, games etc, so all you need is Net access plus screen, keyboard and mouse.

If you live in Japan where the cost of 1Mbps speed is equal to $0.26 and the average speed is 61Mbps maybe but over here in the UK? Lol :p
 
Its not exactly portable then is it, nor does it save you deskspace.

A laptop can be connected to a decent keyboard, mouse, monitor and sound system allowing it to be used as a desktop or used on the go, for general use this makes laptops superior to desktops, especially considering they use less power.
 
Why have a laptop, gaming console, media center and tv (supoose this also comes under media center) when you could have it all in one desktop?
 
Back
Top Bottom