However Wikipedia is alive and well (probably wrong though).
It was a wee poke of fun, I'm well used to running latin through wiki with dolph and DD these days

However Wikipedia is alive and well (probably wrong though).
"Reduction to absurdity." It's a classic logical fallacy.
It was a wee poke of fun, I'm well used to running latin through wiki with dolph and DD these days![]()
Meh, beaten like a ginger stepkid...![]()
Aye, I thought so. Why must people use those terms?
No, mavity is a fact and a theory, just like evolution. The theory relates to the predicted mechanism by which the observed behaviour occur.Ironically, I had to explain to someone on here that mavity is, in fact, just a theoretical model and not fact per se.
Sure, it happens, and we can model it, but we don't know how or why it happens.
Where's you review on Avatar? Please don't post again until this is done. Thanks.
Trying for a booking at the local 3D cinema this week. Just have to find a night when my mother can babysit for us. Is that OK with you?
Isaac Newton himself said, 'I suspect that my theories may all depend upon a force for which philosophers have searched all of nature in vain.' Of course, he is alluding to a higher power."
I would rather he died than any mass murderer that is still alive
My favourite onion 'touch' is the last bit of one of their clips...
'in other news, a massive earthquake has wiped out etchisketchistan'
I read this whole article thinking WTF?, then read, from the onion, great stuff as usual
He was very religious so if they're taking the **** with that part too its a bit of a fail![]()
It'll do. At least it'll put Neil Fawcett out of his misery.
(post wasn't entirely serious, i was just bored)
I would rather he died than any mass murderer that is still alive
This is part of the joke, right?degrees in education, applied Scripture, and physics
Every time I hear "scientific fact" I wince. The whole point to science is that it's a continually evolving (meaning "to roll out", iirc) model, as soon as you enshrine something as factual people stop questioning it and things tend to stagnate. Describing evolution as a fact before it is even a completed theory strikes me as particularly premature. Or perhaps this is just another case of the public using terms vaguely when they have specific definitions in the sciences.No, mavity is a fact and a theory, just like evolution. The theory relates to the predicted mechanism by which the observed behaviour occur.
He was very religious, but he attributed the laws of science to nature, not to God.
"Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing them down,"
This is part of the joke, right?
Not so sure about this one. He lived in a time where it was important to phrase everything as investigating Gods work, it would have been very unwise to publish as an atheist. I believe he was generally considered a very unpleasant man, though this is perhaps not incompatible with Christianity.
Is there any evidence that he was a religious man beyond the politically sensible phrasing of his work?