Nick Griffin on Haiti

He's right in some vague respects, a global government would be horrific for humanity, which essentially where everything is now heading in this world, central banks are also horrific, money shouldnt of got privatised, but it did, the worlds slipping away as we loose touch with reality - just what the people who control this world want.
 
Nix said:
What, that you're just a horrible person? Yeah, we've got that message coming through loud and clear right now.

LOL at you trying to look down your nose a 'liberal hippies' like that's a bad thing. Grow up.
Click to expand...
You fail to answer my original question. Have you donated anything to the disaster or are you just being contrary in the hope you may look good ? Sold your car to help dying people ? surely you can do without your car for the sake of peoples lives ? Thought not, guess you are just as selfish.
 
Darkst4r said:
You fail to answer my original question. Have you donated anything to the disaster or are you just being contrary in the hope you may look good ? Sold your car to help dying people ? surely you can do without your car for the sake of peoples lives ? Thought not, guess you are just as selfish.
Click to expand...

Straw man argument. If I did or did not has no relevance to what I'm saying about the reality of the situation. You're trying to discredit me because you can't deny my argument.

I haven't personally got enough to give, but I'm happy for what I've paid in tax to go there. It's not going to stop the trains or buses running on time, is it?
 
Darkst4r said:
Why is the life of a family pet of 8 years any different to a human life ? How much have you donated ? All these liberal hippies that keep spouting off about humananity probably haven't donated a single penny to haiti.
Click to expand...

Hang on, you seriously believe this? A human life should always be considered more important than that of an animal.
 
Darkst4r said:
You fail to answer my original question. Have you donated anything to the disaster or are you just being contrary in the hope you may look good ? Sold your car to help dying people ? surely you can do without your car for the sake of peoples lives ? Thought not, guess you are just as selfish.
Click to expand...

What he (or anyone else) may or may not have donated is irrelevant, you're just making yourself look an idiot by trying to persue this argument.
 
I'm pretty sure you can easily get a job for more than £60/week... you don't have to let the family pet die or go hungy...

Tried mcdonalds? supermarkets? council?
 
Nix said:
Straw man argument. If I did or did not has no relevance to what I'm saying about the reality of the situation. You're trying to discredit me because you can't deny my argument.

I haven't personally got enough to give, but I'm happy for what I've paid in tax to go there. It's not going to stop the trains or buses running on time, is it?
Click to expand...
So you are disagreeing with me and arguing because I personally dont have enough to give so won't be, while you are in the same situation ?

All I'm saying is I'm sick of watching government appeals of dusty crying children to make me feel guilty about not donating when the government shaft us every damn day for money while hording billions of "just in case" money every year.
 
Not to mention the fact if you can't afford to keep an animal there are plenty of places you can take it like Dog's Trust etc. It's hardly a life or death situation.
 
i'd partially agree if i'm honest.. there was a similar thing to what Griffin said here that was reported quite a few years ago...

Found the link just:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2006/oct/28/health.medicineandhealth

Like i said it was done a few years ago but if you dig a little deeper you'll find that there are still thousands in the UK who die needlessly.

I'd go out on a limb and say we should offer aid, however it shouldn't be a case of handing out cold hard cash, rather clothing donations from charities being re-directed for a time...
 
Wicksta said:
Not to mention the fact if you can't afford to keep an animal there are plenty of places you can take it like Dog's Trust etc. It's hardly a life or death situation.
Click to expand...

Give it a rest. I'm saying if comes between donating money to charity and giving my pet the medical care he needs I'm choosing the dog every time.
 
Wicksta said:
Not to mention the fact if you can't afford to keep an animal there are plenty of places you can take it like Dog's Trust etc. It's hardly a life or death situation.
Click to expand...

He can only not afford to keep it because it's fallen ill.

And I'm guessing you don't have a pet such as a dog or cat? Since you don't seem to acknowledge just how hard it is to give up such a thing just because it falls ill.

Before my dog passed away I'd have lived on bread and water for a month if it meant I could afford the pet bills to keep it alive, rather than send it to a shelter.
 
Darkst4r said:
So you are disagreeing with me and arguing because I personally dont have enough to give so won't be, while you are in the same situation ?

All I'm saying is I'm sick of watching government appeals of dusty crying children to make me feel guilty about not donating when the government shaft us every damn day for money while hording billions of "just in case" money every year.
Click to expand...

No, we all pay our taxes to the same place.

You're kicking up a fuss because the government chose to give some away in aid, whereas I'm not. That's the difference.

I've explained to you that the money is trivial and you wouldn't notice it anyway, but you're still screaming like an hysterical child. You're just a selfish, nasty person and it's evident.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom