In an FWD car, of course - the fronts are steering and driving, the backs are doing sod all
This was my theory, however some people in this thread made me second guess myself.
Moral of the story.
Don't listen to trolls on the internet.
M5 brakes are much bigger for starters and the tires are also wider (Rear 275-40-18's & Front 245-45-18) thus giving a lot me more stopping power.
[TW]Fox;15819825 said:Wow your rear tyres are a whole 10mm wider!
[TW]Fox;15819928 said:A 520i Sport on optional 18's would have 265mm rear tyres, a standard 520i Sport would have 255mm rear tyres![]()
Britain has a "**** it that'll do" attitude.
You just have to look at a rover to know that![]()
What than yours or the 520i ? Oh and you forgot about my brakes![]()
It essence it boils down to this though ...I don't care what crap you come up with to say otherwise (when I say you, I mean generally, not anyone in particular) ...having four matched and good quality tyres on your car is always better than driving around with miss-matched or el-cheapo Ling Long tyres of ditch-finding doom. And it isn't a massive cost either, to progress from rubbish to decent tyres, if you can't afford it, you can’t afford to run your car, basically.
Fitting decent quality tyres to your car and making sure they are always in serviceable condition, (along with the rest of your car) is a responsibility to others as much as yourself.
Yes it is.And it isn't a massive cost either, to progress from rubbish to decent tyres,
I'm pretty sure it isn't.I know what I am saying is true anyway.
I disagree, there is no need to spend 80 a corner rather than 15 per corner at a scrappy/breakers yard
[TW]Fox;15820834 said:http://www.rodge.force9.co.uk/picard-facepalm.jpg[img][/QUOTE]
Face palm all you want, you have spouted this :
[QUOTE]Yea because only performance cars go round corners or need to brake harshly in an emergency situation [/QUOTE]
Slow/calm drivers do not at all need anywhere near the cornering ability of someone who rags his car about.