9/11 Third Tower mystery "solved".

[Tefal]

Getting military grade sure... but you only need a half decent chemist and theres 100s of ways to make explosives from every day chemicals that in enough quantity would do the same thing - off the top of my head fertilizer/some stuff with nitrates is the only one thats really actively tracked.

Not really, if you want them to work well and actually have a shelf life long enough to make the quantity needed you need quite sophisticated set up.

Plus improvised explosives/fertiliser explosives take up a huge amount of space and someone would demand to know why you where shipping tones of material up their building.

 

[anything I don't mind]

WTC7 only reached NEAR freefall speed for ~10 floors, these were at the lower levels. The total fall time was much higher than free fall speeds.

Why not read the nist final report. Or can you not remember you saying I was referencing old nist reports, which you obviously hadn't clicked on as I showed you it was 2008 final.

actually ae911truth have put out video analysis of the wtc7 "collapse" within a physics program that measures freefall speed etc. you can find it on their website, you will see that the evidence shows the building was in free fall for 2.5 seconds which was pretty much most of the building, it only reached resistance after more than half of the building was demolished.

 

[Cyanide]

well when it comes to speculation, now there is somthing i can do... try...

speculation as to how they got the explosives into the building, logisitically it had to be spray on or roll on therimite in its more modern nano therimite form which is high grade military explosive.

security had to be compromised prior to the day and countless witness gave testimony on work being done in the building at weird hours and weird scenarios etc.

the whole argument that too many people would need to be involved is not an argument because in history operations with over 50 000 people have occured with it staying classified for over 30 years.

but 9/11 used compartmentalization and they would have killed off any loose ends as well, but what i say here is highly classified...

If it's so highly classified that they're willing to kill US citizens who know about it/are involved with it how come you're willing to post about it? Not afraid the FBI will bust open your door, shoot you in the face until you die of it then cover it up saying your were kidnapped and giant sea turtles?

 

[Tefal]

speculation as to how they got the explosives into the building, logisitically it had to be spray on or roll on therimite in its more modern nano therimite form which is high grade military explosive.

NO!

That's not how thermite works...

 

[keyser87]

people have watched too much zeitgeist and too much loose change.

The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic. The truth is, that it is not the Jewish banking conspiracy or the grey aliens or the 12 foot reptiloids from another dimension that are in control. The truth is more frightening, nobody is in control. The world is rudderless.

some arab guys ****ed us over, the government failed to acknowledge a threat, people died in the thousands.

 

[Glaucus]

actually ae911truth have put out video analysis of the wtc7 "collapse" within a physics program that measures freefall speed etc. you can find it on their website, you will see that the evidence shows the building was in free fall for 2.5 seconds which was pretty much most of the building, it only reached resistance after more than half of the building was demolished.

Rubbish,. as explained in many debunking videos they started the clock well after the initial collapse.

 

[RDM]

Getting military/industrial grade sure... but you only need a half decent chemist and theres 100s of ways to make explosives from every day chemicals that in enough quantity would do the same thing - off the top of my head fertilizer/some stuff with nitrates is the only one thats really actively tracked.

Yes, but it isn't only terrorists that know this, hence when anyone starts buying these chemicals in the sorts of quantities you would need and doesn't have a legitimate reason it starts to promote interest. Especially since Oaklahoma, which was just the sort of fretiliser bomb that you are referring to.

 

[LiamC]

There are many Questions yet to be answered.

Untill then i remain open minded.

 

[andymanis]

Before you dismiss the CT i suggest you do your research and watch Loose Change and Zeitgeist. People who were interviewed as on the day say they heard multiple explosions, explosions in the basement, as the bulldings fall you can see small explosions all the way down the building as it falls. People who worked in the building said that weeks running up to it they were evactuated due to fire drills more than often which was strange. Now if they wanted to a controlled demolition, im aware how demoltions are done, but if they were trying to cover it up they aint gonna invite cowboy buolder Barry Wiggins round to do it are they? If we can fly to the moon in the 60's im sure someone could rig a building to fall without making it too obvious. Also note people who spoke out about explosions in the basement either changed their stories weeks later or "died". And do you honestly believe that 4 planes can be hijacked and not a single fighter jet could be scrambled in time to intercept and when you find the reason why they werent scrambled its even more ridiculous.

As for missles, there is only 1 camera which shows the plane which hit the pentagon, its patheticly pixelated and looks nothing like the size of a plane. There was a perfect camera set up at a petrol station which caught it but within minutes of the pentagon being hit the authorities turned up to confiscate the tape. if they wanted proof a plane hit the pentagon why not release that instead of the crappy pixelated version? This is also taking into account the fact that there was next to no plane reckage on the lawn and again where united 93 supposedly crashed.

Within hours of the strike it was already out that it was Bin Laden responsible. The only interview he has ever given he said he didnt do it. If you do something like this you usually want the notoriety and admit to it. If he even exists he knows if he is caught he'll be killed for it so why would he not admit to it if he did it?

Finally think why? Do you honestly think we would be in Afghanistan and Iraq if it wasnt for 9/11 and 7/7. would the whole weak excuse of WMD's of stood up if it wasnt for them, seeing as the WMD argument was the only way to justify invading these countires, ruining them and then contacting western countries to come in and rebuild while oilfields were taken control of?

It scares me how much people take what they see on the news and paper as gospel, ive done research and conclude that even if it didnt happen exactly how i think, i believe that now way did it happen how it was reported and a lot was planned or covered up.

 

[Glaucus]

There are many Questions yet to be answered.

like what

 

[RDM]

Before you dismiss the CT i suggest you do your research and watch Loose Change and Zeitgeist.

Alternatively you could do something more useful with your life and watch paint dry. Not only is it more interesting it is more informative and factual.

 

[cactuscake]

like what

Like "Where was your mother on 11/09/2001?"

 

[Rroff]

Yes, but it isn't only terrorists that know this, hence when anyone starts buying these chemicals in the sorts of quantities you would need and doesn't have a legitimate reason it starts to promote interest. Especially since Oaklahoma, which was just the sort of fretiliser bomb that you are referring to.

Thats a very black and white way to look at it...

Who is to say they would have brought it all in one place, etc.

 

[Glaucus]

Before you dismiss the CT i suggest you do your research and watch Loose Change and Zeitgeist. People who were interviewed as on the day say they heard multiple explosions, explosions in the basement, as the bulldings fall you can see small explosions all the way down the building as it falls. People who worked in the building said that weeks running up to it they were evactuated due to fire drills more than often which was strange. Now if they wanted to a controlled demolition, im aware how demoltions are done, but if they were trying to cover it up they aint gonna invite cowboy buolder Barry Wiggins round to do it are they? If we can fly to the moon in the 60's im sure someone could rig a building to fall without making it too obvious. Also note people who spoke out about explosions in the basement either changed their stories weeks later or "died". And do you honestly believe that 4 planes can be hijacked and not a single fighter jet could be scrambled in time to intercept and when you find the reason why they werent scrambled its even more ridiculous.

These what not explosions. these were debris and air build up. Different carastics and backed up by film analysis

4. Weren't the puffs of smoke that were seen, as the collapse of each WTC tower starts, evidence of controlled demolition explosions?

No. As stated in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, the falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it—much like the action of a piston—forcing smoke and debris out the windows as the stories below failed sequentially.

These puffs were observed at many locations as the towers collapsed. In all cases, they had the appearance of jets of gas being pushed from the building through windows or between columns on the mechanical floors. Such jets are expected since the air inside the building is compressed as the tower falls and must flow somewhere as the pressure builds. It is significant that similar “puffs” were observed numerous times on the fire floors in both towers prior to their collapses, perhaps due to falling walls or portions of a floor. Puffs from WTC 1 were even observed when WTC 2 was struck by the aircraft. These observations confirm that even minor overpressures were transmitted through the towers and forced smoke and debris from the building.

As for missles, there is only 1 camera which shows the plane which hit the pentagon, its patheticly pixelated and looks nothing like the size of a plane. There was a perfect camera set up at a petrol station which caught it but within minutes of the pentagon being hit the authorities turned up to confiscate the tape. if they wanted proof a plane hit the pentagon why not release that instead of the crappy pixelated version? This is also taking into account the fact that there was next to no plane reckage on the lawn and again where united 93 supposedly crashed.

Where did the plan debris come from?

How were lamposts on the flight path chopped down, with the width of the planes wings? this is something a missile simply can not do.

How was a 10 ton generator clipped by a missile on the flight path and push backwards by a missile? Again something a missile simply can not do.

 

[anything I don't mind]

this is not normal thermite, this is thermite that is used to demolish buildings. hi tech thermite. as a danish professor pointed out, it is called nano thermite. not tradional thermite that only burns through things at high temps this thermite actually has an explosive char to it.

i am willing to talk about it cause i don't think after 10 years on some oc uk forums anyone is going to believe me anyway....

even if they start the clock after the collapse the building is still falling at the speed of mavity and not hitting any resistance for 2.5 seconds, you can see that just by watching the videos.

 

[Cyanide]

Finally think why? Do you honestly think we would be in Afghanistan and Iraq if it wasnt for 9/11 and 7/7. would the whole weak excuse of WMD's of stood up if it wasnt for them, seeing as the WMD argument was the only way to justify invading these countires, ruining them and then contacting western countries to come in and rebuild while oilfields were taken control of?

WMD's weren't used as an excuse to invade Afghanistan and the war's in Iraq and Afghanistan haven't taken control of the oilfields, it's just added to the instability in the middle-east, lowered supply and pushed the $ price of oil up

 

[keyser87]

Before you dismiss the CT i suggest you do your research and watch Loose Change and Zeitgeist.

It scares me how much people take what they see on the news and paper as gospel, ive done research and conclude that even if it didnt happen exactly how i think, i believe that now way did it happen how it was reported and a lot was planned or covered up.

you mean like you take loose change and zeitgiest as gospel? So much wrong with those two 'documentaries' it warrants a 'lmao'

as far as hearing explosions...a plane had just flown into a building which was leaking fuel and starting a fire...

 

[andymanis]

Alternatively you could do something more useful with your life and watch paint dry. Not only is it more interesting it is more informative and factual.

Yeah i can see how trying to broaden your understanding of one of the most important moments in history could be considered a waste of time. Maybe i should be playing COD online and jacking off to internet girls like yourself.

 

[Antar Bolaeisk]

It's quite obvious that since setting up a building for a controlled demolition is a long, arduous task the military had called in their boffins from Area 51 replete with highly experimental explosives possibly utilising matter-antimatter reactions in order to generate enough energy to take down the building. Due to the fact that these anti-matter bombs had such a high yield they were exceptionally small, on a scale of nano-meters and thus were capable of being placed around the tower in plain sight meaning everything was in place days or even weeks in advance of the so called attacks. Obviously, since the technology was still in the testing stage there were a few glitches, someone screwed up and the tower didn't collapse when it was meant to yet the intense heat of the spreading fires was enough to cause the anti-matter bombs to explode later in the day.



Mystery solved

 

[Tefal]

this is not normal thermite, this is thermite that is used to demolish buildings. hi tech thermite. as a danish professor pointed out, it is called nano thermite. not tradional thermite that only burns through things at high temps this thermite actually has an explosive char to it.

No that is not how thermite works in any way at all.


No thermite is used to demolish buildings because settings fire to a building for demolition purposes is a terrible idea.