Not even remotely. And besides which, Microsoft are not well known for backwards compatibility. I had to work on a team for a bank that spent 12 months finding suitable replacements/upgrades for off-the-shelf applications when migrating from NT4 to XP. In the region of 12,000 applications, of which only a small percentage (roughly 20%) that didn't need anything changed.
Surely thats down to the vendors rather than Microsoft though. How can you blame them if application 'x' doesn't work on the next version of Windows?
M.
That's because their mice can right clickHave been able to since the Mighty Mouse
- Although the Apple mice do indeed suck balls
- Haven't tried their new one though..
Phate, I've been an Apple user since the Macintosh Classic so I do know you can right click on a Mac nowadays. Hell I've heard you can cut and paste on an iPhone!![]()
I like the new Magic Mouse but I do have small girly hands. It would be way to small for people with large hands... anyway I digress.
You are misreading my post. I'm claiming there is no problem writing software that can match or exceed the capabilities of the Windows OS or other MS apps (I'm talking about technical capabilities, not compatibility). Amp34 asked who should replace them, which I took to mean are they replaceable ?
If he meant what should we do if MS shuts down tomorrow, Windows is banned, and we are left with huge amounts of legacy software he should have been more explicit.
That's because their mice can right clickHave been able to since the Mighty Mouse
- Although the Apple mice do indeed suck balls
- Haven't tried their new one though..
Frustrates me that the default is no secondary click though. For all of the 5 secs it takes to change it.That's because their mice can right clickHave been able to since the Mighty Mouse
.
Despite no one bringing it up in any anti apple rant for the last 5 years LordSplodge always feels the need to say it as if they had in every single apple thread...
Apple![]()
Not even remotely. And besides which, Microsoft are not well known for backwards compatibility. I had to work on a team for a bank that spent 12 months finding suitable replacements/upgrades for off-the-shelf applications when migrating from NT4 to XP. In the region of 12,000 applications, of which only a small percentage (roughly 20%) that didn't need anything changed.
With Vista being such a disappointment, Windows 7 looking a tad overrated and the death of PC gaming I can tell you that the laptop I bought in '08 will be the last Windows PC I ever buy. My next laptop will be a Macbook Pro. The iPhone has reinvigorated my waning enthusiasm for computers and gadgets.
I'm not convinced by the iPad though, but who buys v1 of an Apple product anyway?
It's a nice simple way of paraphrasing the normal anti-Apple posts in GD.
See, this is what I don't get, why, because you ahve an iPhone does that mean you want a macbook? Except for the Apple love? There is a big difference between a phone and a omputer so what makes you think apple will light your life up in the laptop world?![]()
I'm not against macbooks in the slightest, in fact if I was replacing my laptop now I would probably get a 13" macbook pro as they are the best laptops out there for my needs at the moment, for less money than some of the alternatives, just I wouldn't buy one for the OSX alone, in fact I would probably stick windows 7 on it instead. Afterall macbooks are just laptops..
(as happens on desktop Windows OS - McShield.exe I'm looking at you!).
No way. IPhones' are buggy as hell. The number of times I nearly smash my 3Gs up.It's just a feeling I get when I use my iPhone and the limited times that I've used a Macbook, just that everything is functioning as it was designed.
Out of interest why would you buy a macbook and put Windows on it? Surely you can get more hardware for your money buying a standard PC laptop?
No way. IPhones' are buggy as hell. The number of times I nearly smash my 3Gs up.
Most of the point of owning a Mac is OS X.![]()