You what? if those numbers are accurate the 5850 beats the 470 over a lot of the benchmarks and the 470 is very likely to be more expensive![]()
*looks at slides again*
what?

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You what? if those numbers are accurate the 5850 beats the 470 over a lot of the benchmarks and the 470 is very likely to be more expensive![]()
You what? if those numbers are accurate the 5850 beats the 470 over a lot of the benchmarks and the 470 is very likely to be more expensive![]()
to be honest, i cant see the 480 being that low
just look at the 295 when that come out
But to be fair over 500 quid for a graphics card is hardly an investment![]()
Only the clinically insane I guess
I'm laying bets on £350 for the 470 and £500 for the 480. Any takers?![]()
Imo £300 for the 470, and £450 for the 480.
Any more and even nvidia fanboys would avoid.
Do not underestimate the power of brand loyalty. Nvidia certainly don't. Fanboys would happily pay £500+.
Its not just a huge increase in speed that this series of cards brings over the ati competition.
But a whole new range of AA and AF settings and other image improvements compared to ati.
As did the people that bought a 5970, blind fanboyism works both ways![]()
But we hardly need to pile on EXTRA aa/af at the resolutions people are going to be running. Its all about pushing the FPS envelope and running at the highest possible resolution. 2560x1440
I'm disappointed looking at the slides TBH.
Radeon 5870 is two Radeon 5870s (with lower clocks) and it's only 60% more expensive.