PC gaming expense ?

Permabanned
Joined
19 Oct 2007
Posts
6,322
Location
.
Im in the frame of mind now where I play one game on the pc (BC2) and many more on the olde xbox.

The xbox costs £200 and all the hardware i need to run bc2 costs me £1500.

Granted, I can do other things such as video editing and folding, but for a simple gaming rig it doesnt make economical sense.

Thoughts ?
 
Bit of a no brainer, gaming on the PC is more expensive than on the consoles. Even more so lately since second hand market is pretty much dead although new releases can still be had cheaper than console counterparts. As mentioned though it doesn't have to be that expensive though, you certainly don't need a £1500 PC to run things on.
 
1) usually you dont pay the full cost of the console, they make the money on the software
2) as stated before you dont need a 1500 pc to play the game... im sure it will fire up fine on a 2nd hand £200 pc...
 
Shall we list things that an Xbox 360 doesn't do first? Fed up with "PC gaming is too expensive" stuff. How about you buy am Xbox for gaming and a PC good enough for general stuff...

Wait, no.. That would be expensive!
 
a £1000 PC would easily run BC2 at high res (probably so would a £700 PC)

+ you dont always have to spend that amount as you can usually carry over some components e.g keyboard, mouse, screen hard drives etc.

over two years lets say you buy 20 console games @ £50 = £1000

with a PC you could probably spend ~ £25 for the same = £500

you can see that the difference is rapidly made up in game price, and you can do a lot more on a PC.

I wouldnt dispute that PC's are expensive- I personally wouldnt buy one exclusively for gaming.
 
I have a £500 PC and can play any latest game I throw at it on medium or high res. Plus do writing and graphics and video editing.
 
Honestly I'm running BC2 on max settings (admittedly dx9) with an old 2.8GHz e6300 and an ATI 4890. The whole rig cost me about £340, and produces significantly better graphics than my 360. This doesn't include the cost of things like a monitor, but I wouldn't factor in the cost of a TV into what an xbox cost either.

When you factor in the fact that it produces better quality graphics than the xbox, and everything you can do with a PC compared to a console, it's the consoles which start to look expensive. Add in the fact that games are about £10 more expensive on consoles too.
 
Maxed out, how it should be played!

You think that what you see on the xbox version of BC2 is comparable to being 'maxed out' on a PC version? :p

For the same performance and image quality, we could spec you a far cheaper rig. As Setroc demonstrates, you don't need 1500's worth of PC bling to 'max out' gaming.

Also remember that components suffer from diminishing returns, having an exponential price growth with respect to performance. Hence why you can spend 1000 pounds on a processor that's....well..not 5x better than its 200 pound counterpart :p

Anyway, this debate has been done to death and seriously, if you've spent 1500 pounds on a rig just to play one game...:rolleyes:
 
There's certainly something to be said for value of money for the xbox over PC, despite it's ageing technology. I look at my sons gaming experience over mine and what he plays and who he plays with.. at a snip of the price I pay for my PC.. We both have Mw2 yet can't play each other.. Eghhh

The quality of some PC games certainly outshine their siblings but then is that really important? Once you're in game, do really notice the finer details that's cost £600 more to play than the xbox equivalent? Let's be realistic about this.. it's the same game.

Furthermore, xbox games are pretty consistent in terms of reliability and content. For example, how many PC games have you got working first time recently, how PC games have or do not have achievements..

I say the PC gaming industry really needs to catchup very quickly, tackle piracy (which looking at the MW2 statistics is pretty appalling) and provide a more consistent dashboard to play other players..and across other platforms otherwise when the next generations are realised, we could be seeing bye-bye to PC games as we know it.

If i were a developer/publisher, i would stay clear of PCs because there's clearly no financial benefit..
 
Last edited:
Honestly I'm running BC2 on max settings (admittedly dx9) with an old 2.8GHz e6300 and an ATI 4890. The whole rig cost me about £340, and produces significantly better graphics than my 360. This doesn't include the cost of things like a monitor, but I wouldn't factor in the cost of a TV into what an xbox cost either.

When you factor in the fact that it produces better quality graphics than the xbox, and everything you can do with a PC compared to a console, it's the consoles which start to look expensive. Add in the fact that games are about £10 more expensive on consoles too.

I wish they would bring forza3 to the pc. Its the only reason i bought an xbox!
 
There's certainly something to be said for value of money for the xbox over PC, despite it's ageing technology. I look at my sons gaming experience over mine and what he plays and who he plays with.. at a snip of the price I pay for my PC.. We both have Mw2 yet can't play each other.. Eghhh

True, that's why you don't buy a £1500 pound computer to 'max out' Crysis, or BC2. To be honest, if one's even considering investing that much money into a pure 'gaming rig' then money's probably not much of an issue here. What makes PCs special is multitasking and their ability to perform an extraordinary number of tasks. That's where the value for money comes in. I'm sure you yourself can give numerous examples of this.

The quality of some PC games certainly outshine their siblings but then is that really important? Once you're in game, do really notice the finer details that's cost £600 more to play than the xbox equivalent? Let's be realistic about this.. it's the same game.

That's for people to decide themselves, some people are just keen on the idea of seeing every pixel's worth of quality on their 1920x1200 monitor. Not me I have a very modest rig, with a modest resolution monitor, but as mentioned above, some people just have the money to throw at it..
More importantly. it's also worth taking into account technologies such as eyefinity which certainly set the PC apart as it's totally unviable (to my knowledge) on 'modern' console hardware. Also if i'm not mistaken, the xbox can't pull near enough to 120fps on modern games to make 3D vision viable.

Furthermore, xbox games are pretty consistent in terms of reliability and content. For example, how many PC games have you got working first time recently
Most of the games I own..:confused: Although i understand that people do have problems sometimes, more often than not either a developer's been extraordinarily lazy/stupid, there's conflicting software on the system or it's a problem between the keyboard and chair.

how PC games have or do not have achievements..
Going to just ignore this :p

I say the PC gaming industry really needs to catchup very quickly, tackle piracy (which looking at the MW2 statistics is pretty appauling) and provide a more consistent dashboard to play other players..and accross other platforms otherwise when the next generations are realised, we could be seeing bye-bye to PC games as we know it.

Yea this is true :(. Although I imagine the main reason for separation is control interface. Keyboard+Mouse vs 360 controller on an FPS? Yea we all know how that's going to turn out :D it just wouldnt be fair.
Unless they want to risk homogenisation of control interface to keyboard and mouse, then it's best to keep the multiplayers seperate.. Controllers are what make consoles special after all! :D
 
Last edited:
How much did your TV cost?

Granted, you cant play on a PC without a screen, and your TV does other stuff - but a £200 Xbox is useless without a ~£500 TV.
 
Last edited:
In the last 2 years my PC has cost me:

£24 for a CPU cooler to get better OC
£160 for an SSD
£260 for a new 5850
£280 for two new LCD's
Total= £724

None of which were really needed, and were bought by choice to further my use of the machine the way I like to use it.

All the other components were already in my rig before that...

In the last two years my Xbox died (out of warranty) so had to replace with a new one...

£200 for the original one
£180 for replacement
Total= £380

On my PC, I not only play many games, but also watch movies, listen to music, encode videos, browse the web, send emails, maintain a website... the list goes on...

On my 360 I play the odd game and sometimes*, if my PS3 wont play an .avi, I'll play the odd movie on it....

All in, I think the PC is better value, ultimately, when the PC starts to struggle, I can simply upgrade.... can't say the same for the Xbox...
 
Back
Top Bottom