And how to they compensate for the complete and utter variability in the wind from the sniper to the er..opponent? Madness..
In my opinion this is a better shot: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article158181.ece
Will now wait for Gaidin109 to comment about who made the shot ...
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not.
The 7.62 calibre round from Matt’s L96 sniper rifle was aimed 56ft to the left to allow for the wind, and 35ft high to allow for the distance.
Aimbot, tbh.
How do they compensate for what the wind is doing half a mile away?
And how to they compensate for the complete and utter variability in the wind from the sniper to the er..opponent? Madness..
You ain't doing to well at this quoting malarkey are ya goblin![]()
these shots that are aimed 10's of feet off the target, I'm assuming this is done with the little dials on the scope? so you still have the target in the cross hair?
I meant you might point out that such total skill could only come from a RMI thought that about the spotter also.
To be fair, Accuracy International have been building awesome rifles for years.
You can dial in correction on a scope so the target stays in the crosshairs up to (depending on scope) say 40 MOA which at this range is 33ft.
After that you have mil dots on a scope that allow you to judge another 14 ft or so, after that you're using training and skill to judge it.
Working out the parabolic described by the bullet at that kind of range must have required almost genious. I thought something must have been wrong with the reporting as the bullet would have dropped over 20m during the course of it's flight if it was fired on a flat trajectory (if my elementary physics is right!). Working out what elevation you need to make the bullet climb just the right ammount during flight before starting to fall would be an almost insane task on the fly - kind of rams home just how much these guys must know about their weapons.
And for the record, do I believe it right to glorify someone for killing people trying to kill your mates? Absolutely!