Where was I fearmongering? I was saying people like you who are being pedantic and the people in this thread who are going on about it being in international waters, media included, would be making the exact opposite argument in the situation I outlined.
30 miles from the UK is not 90 miles into the Meditteranean though.
This is my problem with half the people in the thread, they are complaining because they don't like( and don't have a clue about) Israel's behaviour, not because it is in international waters, their arguments will change from one situation to another.
Not all situations are identical. I wouldn't have a problem if they destroyed rocket launchers in Gaza. Even a pre-emptive strike is legitimate if you have accurate knowledge of an imminent enemy attack (example - armed troops massing on your border).
I didn't claim anything, I was giving examples of situations where your argument and the "general" arguments would be on exactly the opposite side, IE, as and when it suits people the rules being followed or ignored is up to them on a per situation basis.
I made an argument specific to this case.
Its wrong for Israel to flout them, but its fine for other people in situations deemed ok.
I'd say the same thing if Palestinian commandos seized a civilian Israeli boat 90 miles away.
As for it being an obvious boat, if something has to be brought in, are you going to try and hide it on the boat most people wouldn't think you'd try to hide on, or the small boat going at night appearing from nowhere without a reason for being there.
Fair enough, and did they find arms caches?
Also, on boats that large, you can search all day and still miss a massive cache of arms or 3 terrorists hidden in some passageway you missed.
Military technology has brought us radio frequency scanners and other devices that can penetrate solid objects (pun not intended).
I do like the fact you said I like to fearmonger to justify anything, I very VERY specifically am completely opposite to that, I made EXAMPLES of why OTHER people would complain, not things I'm complaining about, I couldn't give two hoots frankly, but peoples stupid arguments in this thread irked me, nothing more or less.
I didn't call Israel terrorists so your examples are misplaced.
I'm completely against the idea of adding new laws hurting normal people and being justified by ridiculous scaremongering over possible terrorist attacks, I'm completely against changing the way we live/run the country based on sporadic and minimal terrorist attacks, you couldn't have been more incredibly wrong with that statement, or really anything else you've said.
If you're playing devil's advocate then please say so - I can only take your argument at face value...
so you are telling me that you are certain that the IDF policy for conducting a night-time boarding and seizure of a boat attempting to violate their blockade is to ensure the commandos leading the seizure are carrying radio frequency scanners? and that if they are not then Israel are being duplicitous about their motives?
It would help them find people as well as other objects, wouldn't it? These were military inventions to begin with. Boarding at night makes it difficult to see so the implication seems to be that the IDF wanted to surprise the occupants by catching them in the dark.
Last edited:
