tell me what car i want to buy.

Joshy said:
No, it does not.
Click to expand...

Yes, it does. Are you blind? I've decided to help you out by annotating your picture.

soar12.jpg


I suck at paint, the eject button is just below the end of the line.

A) You cannot see the font in that picture.
Click to expand...

You can. See picture. I've highlighted it for you.

B) It's font. Who cares?
Click to expand...

It's just one of the many things that add '90'sness', a term you are having a comical amount of inability comprehending.

Because £6,000 isn't really THAT much in the grand scheme of things?
Click to expand...

Is that why you dont drive a £6k car?

Without sounding like too much of a fanboy, Soarers represent brilliant value for money if you are one of the seemingly few people who can see past the fact that they are 20 year old cars. When the OP said that he didn't care about Image I thought he was one of those people.
Click to expand...

He doesnt care about image but he still might care about interior asthetics. For example many people who dont care about image but might care about a nicer modern interior might buy, say, a Skoda Superb. Clearly a car with zero image but.. a modern interior.
 
Jaguar X-type 3.0?

Based on a Mondeo so it handles well but with the beauty of slightly more power, 4WD and a plusher interior (although not many more gadgets than the Mondeo)
 
Joshy said:
Why don't you try serve up some suggestions instead of crappy insults?
Click to expand...

It's not an insult, it's my opinion.

Why don't YOU make a decent suggestion instead of making things up as the OP didn't even ask for a Grand Tourer and you somehow plucked this out of thin air to make your suggestion more credible.

It's a crap suggestion for a £6000 car so deal with it.
 
I dont think it was a bad suggestion as such, but the fact he just didnt get it when the OP said it was a bit 90's and then went off on one was rather weird. They came out in 1991 how can it be anything but a bit 90's!
 
i am not going to buy a toyota soarer in this or any other lifetime, short of some crazy life on mars thing taking me back to the nineties (even then i'd probably buy something else), so can we please forget them.

if i wanted a 90s land yacht i'd get an E38 7 series.
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;16908916 said:
Yes, it does. Are you blind? I've decided to help you out by annotating your picture.
Click to expand...

No it does not. This would actually be funny if it were not for the fact that you do seem to truly believe that you're right.

My car does not have a mechanical tape eject button.
 
[TW]Fox;16908673 said:
they were great back when we had tape walkmans and thought Gladiators was amazing but everything moves on.
Click to expand...
Brilliant. I remember Jet eating at a restaurant I worked in, way back in the mid 90's - got her autograph but sadly lost it.

Interesting thread - sorry for the useless post. :o
 
I LOLd too. What a stupid argument though. The OP doesn't like 90s jap interiors, not many people do. So joshy suggests a 90s jap car, but it doesn't have a 90s jap interior because it's different....huh? That soarer interior really isn't very nice at all, fine for a grand but not something I'd want to shell out 6 big ones on.

That would be like the OP saying they had a 406 coupe but it wasn't practical enough. How about a 330ci then? It's different!!

Anyway, back on subject, the x type isn't a bad idea. The 3.0 is actually less powerful than the ST220 IIRC but still plenty power. All the good sides of the mondeo but a bit different and enough to shut your colleague up
 
That 200SX interior is far from standard, 200SX interiors are rankier than a Rankor monster, cheap fittings, plastics, switches, dials and the leather is faux, surely its faux.

Anywho

£6k will get a very nice example of a Toyota Corrola T-Sport facelift model, the facelift 2004+ is a very good looking and over looked car and the facelifts interior is well specced and modern
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom