Wedding Videography Showreel - 2010

Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2005
Posts
17,316
Location
Bristol
Finally completed, our new showreel covering the 09/10 wedding season. Worth watching on YouTube for the 720p version.


The video's not "public" yet so please, please give us your honest C&C so we can make any changes before it is.

Aside from that, I hope you enjoy the watch and I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
 
I like it, very well put together and looks like you've done some exciting weddings.

Only bit I can criticise is when you come out of the freeze frame, the motion is a bit jerky from where the camera moves straight away, maybe try and find a smoother part to use as a freeze or put a white flash in there to briefly cover the movement. Or alternatively do a slow motion/time warp speed up from 0% to 100% over a few frames.
 
Now if the quality was 50% better I can see this being the kind of thing Canon will promote as their EOS all in one in 20 years time! Haha (if you saw the prototype)

I love it. As soon as DSLRs introduced video recording this is exactly what I pictured.

I think its amazingly professional and I would feel as a customer really excited to buy into this.
 
Thanks for all the comments so far guys.

Only bit I can criticise is when you come out of the freeze frame, the motion is a bit jerky from where the camera moves straight away, maybe try and find a smoother part to use as a freeze or put a white flash in there to briefly cover the movement. Or alternatively do a slow motion/time warp speed up from 0% to 100% over a few frames.

Comment noted. Might have a play with a velocity envelope :).

Very good, made me smile in places. Must took a lot of man power. How many people do you have covering each wedding?

One or two depending on the package. Most of the showreel is from a two-camera shoot as we've only just introduced the one-camera package, but there's a few shots from that in there (the Indian one particularly).

Now if the quality was 50% better I can see this being the kind of thing Canon will promote as their EOS all in one in 20 years time! Haha (if you saw the prototype)

I love it. As soon as DSLRs introduced video recording this is exactly what I pictured.

I think its amazingly professional and I would feel as a customer really excited to buy into this.

I hate to break it to you, but this wasn't shot on DSLRs :p. Not sure if that's a good or a bad thing based on your quality comment (though the cameras shoot in 1080p, but it's only uploaded as 720p at the moment)! We are buying a 5DMKII for our top-end package as a third camera, but we normally use and this was all shot on Sony Z7s.
 
Really great concept! Love the introduction - it's a perfect way to show off the benefits of videography!

The music is a perfect fit as well - and I like what you did with the violin scene ;)

My main criticism (and this depends entirely on how it will be used) - it's quite long. Of course, if you would be showing this to a potential client, e.g. on a laptop or iPad etc, then I think it's a good length. For a website, I'd say 2 mins max.

Very well done!
 
I wasn't going to comment before viewing but I now feel I have to just to say what a perfectly wonderful video that is.

Really well put together, great music that fits really well and very good camera work.

Not normally the emotional one (Like everyone on here ;)) But I did feel a tear come to me eye at more than one part. Very good job on catching those memories that couples can now relive and cherish for a lifetime. Videos catch so much more than photos and I think that makes this very special.
 
As wedding videos go this was very very good and wedding videos usually bore the **** out of me.

BUT.......

OK, heres my problem, and before I get started I will admit to being guilty of the following - `best of` videos and galleries on photographers/videographers websites are in no way representative of a `complete` wedding. You/we are picking moments from multiple weddings and putting them to a piece of touching music, maybe throw a few black and whites in there and voila! you have a great marketing tool - however the problem I have found is that its actually rather hard to deliver a singular product that is truly representative of the work in ones gallery or showreel. And thats not necessarily the fault of the photographer/videographer. The issue lies with all these showreels/slideshows that adorn the wedding photographers websites.
For example - I could easily put together a 20 image slideshow paired with a touching piano concerto (maybe something like a nice light Debussy in D minor with that soaring major lift halfway though?) and it would look awesome, you can tell a story nicely - 2 bridal prep shots - a groom standing at the front of a church looking nervous, that first look as they see each other etc - but you try to deliver to a client 20 shots of their day, they are going to go ****ing mental! They want the group shots, they expect photos of every single person doing something emotional/funny/whacky etc.
They have an idea of how their wedding photos will look in their head, but they fail to factor in they are getting ready in a travel-lodge, or the registrar will not allow photos during the ceremony - or the room where they are doing the speeches is darker than midnight in a mineshaft so you are bouncing light off walls to at least add some depth, or they want those amazing portraits but `we can only give you five minutes before we have to sit down to dinner`.
Even the wedding photographers amongst us here like Raymond for example - he posts his very best images of the day - I would be `muy interesado` in seeing a complete wedding from him, warts and all - its not a knock on, god no, but I have worked with many photographers and shot a huge number of weddings myself to know that in every wedding they are a number of images that are just averagely OK.
Now I am in a fortunate position whereas the majority of my clients opt for an album package, which allows me to show my interpretation of the day - and during the sales pitch (even more so now) I say I don`t scrapbook an album - that is - fill it to the brim with photos just for the sake of it - I use phrases such as `we need to allow the images room to breath` etc.. ;)
However a recent example is actually a wedding I shot with your very own Jake/Phate - its one of my favourite collections of the year, we managed to delivery 610 photos, all lovingly processed and telling the story of the day really well. The couple have contacted me and said they LOVED the images, but was there anymore or was that it?? Its damn annoying as there is NOTHING we missed out in terms of events - granted we may not of taken portraits or even photographed all 130 guests there, but it is a solid set. I am looking forward to doing their album shortly to show you don`t need thousands of images to capture the day.

Anway, I have gone off-topic and hjjacked this thread with my monologuing. Its also 03:15 in the morning and I am knackerd!


I`ve actually just read though the post above and don`t think I managed to et around to what I was originally trying to say. But pick over what is here if you like.

M
 
Mark, you are welcome to see 100-200 photos from a wedding if you like on my site (just need a password) :p, the client has more but i no need to upload them all on the site.

And I do agree, best of to a single event is a different ball game.

Goos showreel though :)
 
Oh ****, I knew I posted something last night but just read through it - OK< in my defence that was written at 3am in the morning halfway thru my second bottle of wine.. I`ll leave it up there, but jeez, it sounds as arrogant as hell. sorry :)

Ray - 200 photos? is that what you give them - thats really interesting to know - I am looking at hacking down the number I give them - 200 is what I aim to achieve - do you make it clear to them beforehand thats how many they get?

Sorry to the OP for the threadjack.
 
No, i give them more, but only around 120 in their gallery. :) Max was 200.

I delivered 580 on the last one, contract says 300+ and that's the aim eventually.
 
Back
Top Bottom