i thought the same, and wtf is high energy doing at #3 and not number 1?
its a sham!![]()
Damn your writing style does my head in, amusing piece though.
Although; "On one hand you have truly massive men with arms like tree trunks and an encyclopedic knowledge of bone-crushing moves ready to be unleashed upon some unwitting victim" Unwitting? I thought these guys "fought" each other, not random unsuspecting people.![]()
Yeah, they fought each other, doesn't mean they can't hit non-wrestlerswith their mad-skills, though! Why does my writing style do your head in? I don't mind constructive criticism.
I hear he had to quit because he either killed some one or seriously inured them, not sure how true it is but it looks like he could smother some one easilyGiant Haystacks was 6 ft 11 and weighed 310 kg/49 st
![]()
Giant Haystacks was 6 ft 11 and weighed 310 kg/49 st
[/QUOTE]
Our two big boys at it but not in the 90s:
[INDENT][INDENT][MEDIA=youtube]0DSro4l_0cE[/MEDIA][/INDENT][/INDENT]
WWF was for fairies :D
I find it unnecessarily verbose. Having read your other pieces I tend to like the subject matter and think you do a good job of getting the right amount of content and detail in the articles. I just think you go over the top with the metaphors and thesaurus. Some people clearly like that style (I'm assuming your work goes through editors), I don't.
Heres a vid of "loch ness" (haystacks) vs the giant (big show) in dubya cee dubya, hyuk hyuk. /me shoots holes in roof.
haystacks almost trips up heading to the ring.
Theres no way haystacks was 6 foot 11, if you compare his height to the giant who is a legit 7 foot (despite being billed as 7'4) hes clearly 4 or 5 inches shorter.