I like your processing on them, mostly 1 and 3, unfortunately babies don't do much for me, although its a nice shot, I'd have probably cleaned the snot from his nose firstbut the eyes are nice and sharp. I'm guessing you are using the 50mm f/1.8 for these ones.
Did you mean to have the focus on his hand in the first shot? Obviously with his face obscured it means you can't focus on that, although as the ball was the focal point in the shot I may have focused on that. Number 3 I like, you exposed well with the sun as a rear light on his hair and his face is in focus and nicely lit.
I don't do portraits/people much so some others may be able to give better c+c.
I really like the processing on #1 but the ball covering their face spoils it. I imagine that shot would be great if more was in shot
#2 is well taken and I'd wager is more of an emotional attachment image for yourself, and if mine I'd be chuffed with it. I'm not a fan of kids either and struggled when ordered to take photos of both my cousins kids
I really like #3 with the exception of the borders. It looks like a video still. The image and processing reminds me of my happy childhood in the 70s
What camera did you use for these, and what processing? I'm intrigued as I plan on playing with processing styles in the next month or so with some of my photos to see if I can get anything more from them.
Oh and I was nosing on your flickr account, and I like the processing on this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomwphotography/5047717466/ It's like a shot from the 1930s![]()
I really like the processing on #1 but the ball covering their face spoils it. I imagine that shot would be great if more was in shot
#2 is well taken and I'd wager is more of an emotional attachment image for yourself, and if mine I'd be chuffed with it. I'm not a fan of kids either and struggled when ordered to take photos of both my cousins kids
I really like #3 with the exception of the borders. It looks like a video still. The image and processing reminds me of my happy childhood in the 70s
What camera did you use for these, and what processing? I'm intrigued as I plan on playing with processing styles in the next month or so with some of my photos to see if I can get anything more from them.
Oh and I was nosing on your flickr account, and I like the processing on this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomwphotography/5047717466/ It's like a shot from the 1930s![]()
Absolutely, these photos (like the 2nd one) don't have much context for us but I'm sure for you they are special as you know the background to themI'd have maybe tried to get a shot with him eating the cake (you probably did) for context but that would have meant you wouldn't have got as close to him for this shot.
I usually just use single point focus personally and move my focus points around manually, although as I said I don't do people shots much, but I feel more comfortable knowing exactly where the focus will be on my shots when I use single point non-continuous. I can imagine kids playing sports probably needs AI servo etc in reality
Yes I think number 3 is the strongest image as the lighting is just right and the exposure appears to me dead on and I can't see any under/over exposure in the shot.
I agree on the prime lens thing, I like using my 35mm, it's definitely my "people & party" lens as it's fast sharp and just the right focal length indoors. I find it a bit restrictive outdoors but that's because I prefer a wider focal view but I do enjoy shooting with it nonetheless![]()
Do you use a crop sensor with your 35mm? I sometimes think the 50mm is a bit awkward indoors due to the actual focal length once the crop is factored in as its difficult to find the space to focus depending on the size of the room you are in.
Yes I doAlthough I have a Nikon D90 so I'm not sure what options you have for Canon, there is a Canon 35mm f2 for £200 but I don't know if it's a good lens or not. I chose the 35mm as I knew the 50mm would be too restrictive indoors and I think I was right, it suits me better than a longer lens, although I am weighing up the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 at the moment but more as a complement to the 35mm rather than a replacement.
I was eyeing up the Sigma 30mm f1.4 when I was still on a crop, looks like a nice bit of kit...
Your £300 camera produces better images than I can get out of my £1600 one (camera + lens) mate![]()