There's an easy way around this.
There is an even easier way around this, stop legislating to fix problems with society and instead fix the causes of those issues
There's an easy way around this.
There is an even easier way around this, stop legislating to fix problems with society and instead fix the causes of those issues

This is easier than carrying ID? Your ID must be hella heavy
Sarcasm aside, I agree in principle (not at the ease stance because that's ridiculous), all these measures are purely treating nothing but the symptoms, it's time we as a country looked at the root causes and did something about them.
no they dont !!
how many articles do i have to post before you conceed ?
The article above even has a statement from tesco saying they introduced it as company policy ffs !
There is an offence, but as said its the individual buying who commits the crime, not the shop for selling them.


!) and you know, even if they just screw up once, they can get a fine and maybe even charged for it.I sat the license back in 2000 ish. It was pointed out to us that while you should refuse people who are drunk, the only legal determination of drunkeness was the level for drink-driving. So in theory you should refuse anyone who had had more than a pint![]()
I managed to get into trouble at Tescos as well when me and the kids (4 & 6) were using the self service. They love doing the scanning, so I let them do that and I bagged. The cashier who looks after the self service got very put out when my 6 year old scanned a bottle of wine and passed it to me. She thought I was breaking the law. I didn't. TBH I don't know which of us was right, but I still got the bottle of wine, so I'm claiming it was me![]()
It's anyone you know to be under the influence of drugs or alcohol, at least that's the wording that's been used on the various licence related things I've done. It leaves it very open for interpretation, not sure of any legal precedents regarding it.I've often wondered what the legal definition was in regards to that part of the act, seems like you could take any pub to task on it if you wanted to.
It's anyone you know to be under the influence of drugs or alcohol, at least that's the wording that's been used on the various licence related things I've done. It leaves it very open for interpretation, not sure of any legal precedents regarding it.
If you had shown i.d and were the one purchasing the tool should have sold it to you as if you were to have purchased it for a minor then the onus is on you as would be a fine if that were the case.