Would be a real bummer if at least 1 other person had the same numbers as you! Your profit would then be a huge loss!
Have fun looking through 13,983,816 tickets to see if 1 of them won the jackpot
By the time you've done it the winnings would have probably rolled over because no-one claimed in time.
Have fun looking through 13,983,816 tickets to see if 1 of them won the jackpot
By the time you've done it the winnings would have probably rolled over because no-one claimed in time.
They know if theres a winning ticket, so it wouldn't roll over i think![]()
I didn't mean to calculate the jackpot, I meant to calculate what the rest totted up to, I had a go at working it out the last time this came up, I think even split 3 ways you might still make profit, but probably insufficient to make it worth doing.It's not that difficult. According to the lottery website 45% of the ticket price goes into the prize fund, of which 52% goes into the jackpot fund. Meaning that 23.4% or 3.27m of your stake would go into the jackpot fund bumping the jackpot to around 21.4m if the jackpot is split between just 2 winners you're relying on making more than 3.5m from smaller prizes just to avoid making a loss (which is probably easily achievable although you won't make enough for it to be worthwhile), if it's split 3 ways you're almost certain to lose.
I remember that too. They had printed out completed forms on laser printers then had stacks of people going into shops feeding ticket after ticket through the machines.Saw a documentary many years ago where a couple of guys were trying to buy all the tickets for a draw in the us i think. They were going from store to store using up all the tickets available. Even though they did not manage to get all the numbers covered they still won. Been googling to find it, but no luck.
Exactly, that's why no one has tried it on Uk or Euromillions lotteries.But there is no guarantee you will be the sole winner so could potentially you could lose out.
Saw a documentary many years ago where a couple of guys were trying to buy all the tickets for a draw in the us i think. They were going from store to store using up all the tickets available. Even though they did not manage to get all the numbers covered they still won. Been googling to find it, but no luck.
There was an Australian syndicate that did this with the Virginia state lottery; http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/11/us/lottery-will-pay-disputed-jackpot.html
Just look at last weeks figures:
https://www.national-lottery.co.uk/player/lotto/results/prizeBreakdown.ftl
The jackpot was £11,220,394
The total prize was £18,322,758
This jackpot is £18 million. The jackpot was around 60% of the total prize, so the total prize this time should be roughly £30million.
So spending £14million on tickets, with roughly £12million available for 'other prizes' should mean that even with several main jackpot winners, you should still make a profit.
Only problem is that you would have three days in order to buy 14 million lottery tickets, and they would all have to be individually filled in, you couldn't simply ask for 14million lucky dips![]()
Yep, you would need to process roughly 54 tickets a second, every second, for those 3 days.
If you aimed for the Weds draw, you buy yourself some extra time, but still not enough for it to be physically possible.