[TW]Fox;17729406 said:And the outcome?
Passed no advisories. My cars flawless MOT record remains intact![]()
What was the efficiency rating for it?
[TW]Fox;17729406 said:And the outcome?
Passed no advisories. My cars flawless MOT record remains intact![]()
This is an interesting point, I'd never thought of this before.
I can't say I've ever been asked if any of my cars have an LSD, though. I assume its the customers responsibility to inform the tester?
[TW]Fox;17729794 said:He did say he was amazed at how clean it was and that he had never seem anything like it. He told me to hang onto it! I am going to be stuck in an old 5 Series for ever![]()
My MX5's handbrake is naff. I have to adjust it every year before the MOT. They do test it but I think it's ok as long as it will hold the car, even if that involves pulling it up as far as it goes. I don't have access to my fail document from a few years back, I think an advisory is more likely than a fail.
It failed one year on rear brake efficiency, to which they replied it wasn't possible to adjust them. Needless to say I offered to go in there and give them a demonstration
¬_¬
MOT passed, no advisories too
I was unimpressed with their complementary vacuuming though...
[TW]Fox;17749930 said:You paid £25 to get your car hoovered, as thats how much your MOT cost than mine![]()
My MOT cost £25 more than yours? So you got your MOT done for £30?!