Rioting in London?

I wouldnt be suprised if the "era of new politics" is about to come to an end. Its becoming quite clear that ANY promises made my any politician means absolutely nothing once they are voted in.

This. How can we possibly vote for anyone, if they don't actually do what they say? Waste of everyone's time, burn the liars!
 
It's like throwing a tantrum when mummy won't buy you a PS3 when she is £80,000 deep in credit card debt.

exactly, really sad.
fact is if you cant afford Uni, either save up or ask parents before leaving school or go to work and do uni after.
while i agree the fee's are steep it is still a privilege more than a given for each person within the UK.
 
article-1328385-0C00F467000005DC-643_634x423.jpg

What do this lot study, idleness and being turds? ;)

Throw them out of college, stick them on a chain gang and make them do some work for the benefit of all. :p
 
What Kay Burley?

:D

No, it was some girl that just stepped up to the camera and just started shouting nonsense.

Another was when there was another reporter talking, and there were protesters nearby shouting, the reporter said something like the people next to me are shouting but do not want to be filmed and some guy just got "all up in her face" shouting and pointing at her.
 
1st of many demonstrations to come.

meh, if they strike who are they really hurting, its not like their a critcal service or have any real impact on the econamy....

Why do they think they are owed a university degree, you dont get anything in live for free, they all need to grow up and get a clue about the real world tbh
 
but it's ok for UK gov to spend close a trillion pounds to bailout banks? ofc there is no money left for education, firemen etc...

They didn't, they have a total possible liability of about £850bn but they haven't spent anywhere near that amount. Regardless, what do you think would have happened if they hadn't bailed out the banks? We wouldn't be making cuts to public services as we wouldn't have any public services to cut.
 
They didn't, they have a total possible liability of about £850bn but they haven't spent anywhere near that amount. Regardless, what do you think would have happened if they hadn't bailed out the banks? We wouldn't be making cuts to public services as we wouldn't have any public services to cut.


sry i lived in US for years where one trillion = 1000x a billion.
anyway it is about £850 billion

in answer to your question other banks/investors would have bought the ones that failed at discount prices ;)
 
Last edited:
sry i lived in US for years where one trillion = 1000x a billion.
anyway it is about £850 billion

in answer to your question other banks/investors would have bought the ones that failed at discount prices ;)

what, how could they do that, they all went bust.:D
 
but it's ok for UK gov to spend close a trillion pounds to bailout banks? ofc there is no money left for education, firemen etc...

Because teachers and firemen don't produce anything, they don't pay anything in to the country's financial wealth. The UK is something like a 75% service economy, mostly financial services. All that money the government spends on students and stuff ultimately comes from London bankers. They are the ones paying the bloody taxes!

The government had the option of bailing them out or watching 75% of the GDP implode.

The whole thing is going to implode anyway at some point like other people have mentioned already, because the UK consumes more than it produces. All those media studies, philosophy and history students you see protesting aren't going to help much. I doubt there are many chemical engineering or actuarial science students in that crowd.

The USA is on the right track with Obama wanting to double exports in 5 years. That's why they are debasing the dollar right now. Next step protectionism.
 
The government had the option of bailing them out or watching 75% of the GDP implode.


think you are exagerrating quite a bit - any reliable sources to such wild claims?

also lots of banks/afilliates/finacial structures do business in other countries which don't affect GDP. need to revise your economics
 
Back
Top Bottom