Christian assemblies in schools could face axe over claims they infringe children's human rights
- Thread starter Metatron
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 13,300
- Location
- Near Winchester
In the census, the part where I write "Jedi".
I've said on many occasions now, you are free to voice your opinion and personal feelings on any subject you wish to, be it bigoted or not. I would never RTM or complain about moderation of your views however offensive they may or may not be.
However, just as you are free to air your views, I am free to denounce those views. You can defend them or you can attempt to silence me by stating I have some kind of problem with freedom of speech or other nonsense.
Ok, the headline (given it's the Daily Mail) refers to the part of the 1944 Education Act that states , it's a legal requirement for pupils to take part in a daily act of collective worship ‘of a broadly Christian character'.
This was designed to show the Christian culture of this Country more than trying to indoctrinate children in any way.
The above quote is all that needs to be said or done imo.
Last edited:
Because it's in the Mail, which is the paper of middle class WASPs.
You didn't denounce any views above....you tried to ridicule them. No you didn't seem to have a problem with freedom of speech, you just seemed to have a problem with me expressing my views.
Well thank you for your permission. That's very big of you.
Some of your views deserve ridicule in my opinion, if I am wrong quit whining about it like a girl and explain your views in a way that doesn't come across as bigoted and ridiculous. I'll listen and judge you on the merit of your argument, nothing more or less.
I wasn't giving any permissions, I have none to give. Being intentionally antagonistic detracts from your viewpoint (we have yet to hear that, you seem more interested in arguing nonsense) however. Especially considering I gave you the benefit of the doubt and answered your question,yet you ignored it to continue this nonsense.
Last edited:
Watch this Tefal, try not to cry with laughter
"I don't wanna be racist, but I do have a cold"
I'd try this, but I'm a massive coward and I'd probably end up getting punched.
"I'm not being racist but how do you get to camdon?"
"how's that being racist?"
"It's not that's what i said"
"I'm not being racist but how do you get to camdon?"
"Are you racist!!"
Yeah right. Mad.
Mmm, I'll decide who I listen to and who I do not, I'll judge what you say in the same way as anyone judges anything that anyone says.
I don't know what place you are talking about exactly. You're simply talking nonsense again.
You're judgement of me is meaningless. You simply can't justify your own views so you attempt to deride mine instead.
Last edited:
Mmm, I'll decide who I listen to and who I do not, I'll judge what you say in the same way as anyone judges anything that anyone says.
I don't know what place you are talking about exactly. You're simply talking nonsense again.
You're judgement of me is meaningless.
(what a ****)
Intelligent debate seems to pass you by, doesn't it.
- Status