H or p?

P67 are more expensive but provide more features for the mid user to enthusiast whereas the H67 are much simpler and therefore cheaper.
 
H67 gives you what you need in basic form, less power usage, less features, basic really and aimed at people wanting the best bang for buck on a budget.

P67 as said is more mid to enthusiast, giving multiple pci-e 16x slots, more sata ports, better overclocking capability, debug led's and all of the other fancy bits and bobs that aren't necessarily needed but sometimes wanted.

Andy
 
dont think you can use unlocked multipliers on h boards :)

You can


H67M-GE/HT

■100% All Solid Capacitor design
■Supports Intel® K-Series unlocked CPU
■Supports Dual Channel DDR3 1333
■Intel® HD Graphics 100/200, DX 10.1, Pixel Shader 4.1
■Multi VGA Output options: D-Sub, DVI-D, HDMI and DisplayPort
■2 x Front USB 3.0 ports, 2 x Rear USB 3.0 ports, 2 x SATA3 connectors, 1 x eSATA2 connector
■Supports ASRock Extreme Tuning Utility (AXTU), Instant Boot, Instant Flash, Good Night LED, Multi-Fan Speed Control, AIWI, APP Charger, SmartView
 
1st GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD7 2nd GIGABYTE p67A-ud4 3rd msi p67a-gd55 but still thinking a lot about what to get i too would like the 2600k but got to find more money . need to sell the rig i got now
 
1st GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD7 2nd GIGABYTE p67A-ud4 3rd msi p67a-gd55 but still thinking a lot about what to get i too would like the 2600k but got to find more money . need to sell the rig i got now

Not interested in this one GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD7 too exspensive but other 2 are a choice for me. They say you dont need an exspensive motherboard but i dont want to go too cheap i think £150 tops for me.
 
Not interested in this one GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD7 too exspensive but other 2 are a choice for me. They say you dont need an exspensive motherboard but i dont want to go too cheap i think £150 tops for me.

Surely Asus is the way forward here as have UEFI and Gigabyte don't?
 
Back
Top Bottom