Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Even the horrendously concave E6600 C2Ds worked perfectly fine at stock without lapping. It's just additional unneeded expense for Intel.
Personaly I don't know if I'd bother my self with lapping a cpu. Looks like a lot of hassel and am I right in saying that it's guaranteed to void your warranty as they can tell if its lapped?
Why arn't CPU's automatically lapped before the sale?
Surely this would take 10 seconds for a machine to complete?
Maybe I'm missing something, but it just seems a obvious thing to do![]()
because the average computer user would want the savings not having the cpu lapped by the manufacturer. Although it makes you wonder why they don't do a lapped enthusiast addition
MW
because the average computer user would want the savings not having the cpu lapped by the manufacturer. Although it makes you wonder why they don't do a lapped enthusiast addition
MW
The question should be why do they put heatspreaders on the cores to begin with, older processors just used to have the bare core so with a decent heatsink you got optimum heat transfer.
You can have the best thermal compound/heatsink in the world but if the transfer between core and heatspreader is poor you're going to get hot temps, maybe it's something they do to hinder overclocking.![]()
It's to protect the CPU cores, much harder to damage them with a heatspreader on the top.
Yeah but it's nothing but a hinderance to enthusiasts.
That is one of the reasons for thermal paste, helps to transfer heat and stops the need for the surfaces to be perfectly flat as it bridges the gap.