Moon landing pictures question

groen said:
There are just soo many problems with the moon missions from the 60s and 70s that is unbelievable that sensible people can still possibly hang on to the lie.

How did they power the craft 240 000kms and then how did they get back 240 000kms
how did they power the suits and the air conditioning in them, how did the million dollar rover get power ? car batteries ? yep!!! LOL!!!

You hear that, all we need to go to the moon is a big rocket and some car batteries.

my coffee machine has more advanced chips then they had in 1969 mate. lol!!!
Click to expand...

wow, thats all i have to say..... wow
 
MOOGLEYS said:
The moon landings were tracked on Radar by a few countries inc the Uk, Russia and Australia. Nasa released info on where the craft would be at points so it could be tracked.
Click to expand...

And don't forget the 100s & 1000s of Ham radio enthusiasts like my Grandad.

The number one piece of proof is that America's arch enemy also tracked them to the moon and congratulated them for beating them.
I'm pretty sure if it was faked Russia would have been all over them.
 
stulid said:
600pxaldrinapollo112.jpg


hows that? authentic moon suface behind.
Click to expand...

BigglesPiP said:
It's a shop!
Click to expand...


Neil Armstrong says, "I'm not a shop!"
 
Anybody that doesn't believe the moon landings took place should ask the astronomers who study the moon. The astronauts left reflective prisms on the the moon for laser distance calculations. None of the conspiracy theorists have ask these astronomers how they got there or can explain how.
 
Looks to me that the answer is....the light?

Yeah Earth is also a lot bigger but im sure if you compared the same picture on the moon to a picture of earths horizon at night there would be no issue? :D

Camera lenz? size? time of day? if it really even happend?........lots of contributing questions :P
 
Just a quick question (not doubting the authenticity of the pictures at all), but the photographs have cross hairs on them. Now I know that the focusing screens on Hasselblads have crosshairs on them, but aren't they set in the top of the camera and the light enters through the lens, bounces off a mirror set at an angle and through the focussing screen. Then when the photograph is taken the mirror moves and the light hits the film in the film holder at the back of the shot. So how is it that the focusing screen crosshairs appear on the photo?
 
The moon landing conspiracy is total rubbish.

It only became popular after the programme " Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?" was shown in 2001.

To make a programme like that, they would have had to sit through hours and hours if moon landing footage, and completely ignore everything that would have been IMPOSSIBLE to fake in the 1960's.

The fact is, the people that made that programme didn't even believe the rubbish they were spouting: the film was a work of fiction designed to make money. Anyone that believes their "theories" is officially an idiot.
 
groen said:
There are just soo many problems with the moon missions from the 60s and 70s that is unbelievable that sensible people can still possibly hang on to the lie.

How did they power the craft 240 000kms and then how did they get back 240 000kms
how did they power the suits and the air conditioning in them, how did the million dollar rover get power ? car batteries ? yep!!! LOL!!!

You hear that, all we need to go to the moon is a big rocket and some car batteries.

my coffee machine has more advanced chips then they had in 1969 mate. lol!!!
Click to expand...

well why cant you name ONE then ?

they didnt power the craft for 240 000 Kms , they powered it for 62 miles , after which it was carried by momentum first through the thin outer atmosphere for 100 or so miles then through the vacuum of space.

electricity was provided by batteries , solar power , chemicals , low power use (800 watts max for the rover) this is NASA were talking about... with billions of $ budget and some of earths greatest minds. they have put more into battery and power development than any other organisation on earth.

''You hear that, all we need to go to the moon is a big rocket and some car batteries. ''

well pretty much , why would we need anything more ??? at the end of the day its a long distance flight on a larger scale. humans mental and physical strengths are what currently limit space travel . not the technology.

the chips in your coffee machine wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for people like those who worked on the moon missions. they developed huge amounts of technology during those years and most of it is detailed on the NASA website or in books. you should probably read one sometime!


anyway im getting major deja vu here because im sure you spout these same non problems in every moon thread. go learn some basic physics... gcse level



if you really want to conspire about something then go read the mission logs and conspire about why astronauts comments such as ''it would be horribe living over there'' are followed by pages of blanked out transmissions ;):p
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom