Another reactionary post, Von. The difference for them is psychological, not physical.
Vasectomy
- Thread starter Gimpymoo
- Start date
Another reactionary post, Von. The difference for them is psychological, not physical.
Why?
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 2,336
- Location
- Norwich
Psychological in that the liquid they are "receiving" doesn't have sperm in it?
Or that one day they won't be able to settle down with them and have a family?
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 2,336
- Location
- Norwich
One would assume that a gentleman with a vasectomy has already settled down, or has no intention of having kids. Either way that particular female will be disappointed.
I don't want them. Other people can have them, as long as they don't have too many.
Indeed. Anyway, this thread isn't about me or my experiences/beliefs. But that's what I have been told. I have been dissuaded from having a vasectomy myself - and I'm glad I didn't.
My dad who otherwise knows no pain was walking like John Wayne for a week.
It was so bad everytime he'd move he would grimace and it looked that bad I would be like 'ow ow ow' as well for him! lol.
Not a pretty sight to watch.
Sure you'll be fine good luck.
It was so bad everytime he'd move he would grimace and it looked that bad I would be like 'ow ow ow' as well for him! lol.
Not a pretty sight to watch.
Sure you'll be fine good luck.
Precisely.
They had a live vasectomy on GMTV a few years ago. The patient was given a small local anaesthetic (not that it did him any good) and then the doctor burnt his balls with what looked like a soldering iron.
I don't want kids but I don't think I'd want the snip either, in case I change my mind.
I don't want kids but I don't think I'd want the snip either, in case I change my mind.
Probably cheaper than funding extra oops babies from cradle to grave.
I doubt the irresponsible chavs would be the type to be considering a vasectomy in the first place.
Deleted member 66701
Deleted member 66701
Going for mine on Monday evening - I'll let you know!
33, three kids, happily married - times right. Should be fun going "bare back" for those sleepy mornings or bath/shower etc
Never got much of an innings when trying for kids - conceived within a month for each of them - far to virile 
33, three kids, happily married - times right. Should be fun going "bare back" for those sleepy mornings or bath/shower etc
Never got much of an innings when trying for kids - conceived within a month for each of them - far to virile
Last edited by a moderator:
Absolutely ridiculous, if there is more than 1% of women with an IQ above 89 with this viewpoint, excluding those who want kids, I'll eat my hat.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 91,805
- Location
- Falling...
Indeed.
I am 32, have three children and me and the Mrs are happy with our lot.
I do not want to father children with another mother as I feel that would be cheating on my children, if that makes sense.
That's fair enough. It's the younger people with no kids who decide to have them I can't understand.
