London Teen stabbed 24 times...

Status
Not open for further replies.
kwerk said:
If black people are 12% of london's population what percentage are black MALES then? It's going to be roughly 1/2 of the 12% or 6% of the whole. That is who is committing the crime, there's no point counting females.
Click to expand...

So you're not counting females for the crime statistics, but you are for the whole population? If you're discounting black females to arrive at your 6% figure, why are you not discounting non-black females from the whole? That, of course, is before we get on to the question of why you're discarding the figures for females at all - according to the irrelevant US statistics you posted, females accounted for more than 10% of homicidesin 2009 - would you consider that figure to be negligible?
 
dirtydog said:
I said it doesn't SIMPLY refer to skin colour.

The wiki page agrees it only refer to skin colour in part.

Your attempt to trip me up falls flat on its face :(
Click to expand...

And says nothing about race in that sentence either does it?

Word games.

You are wrong.

You are racist.

You merely point at the blacks because of the colour of their skin and go 'look'.
 
Okay. I hope people will read what I say and the links for themselves rather than take your hysterical point of view as gospel.
 
dirtydog said:
The same thing that stops whites / blacks etc. born in the USA as being 'native American' :)
Click to expand...

But native american is a specific ethnic term, English isn't, it is a nationality. If you want to define it as a specific ethnic term then what criteria are you going to use and how are you going to differentiate it from being Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Nothern European etc?
 
Castiel said:
Why is it fair to say?

Tokyo has crime levels historically far greater than London.

However, you hit the nail on the head, it is Human Nature, this has nothing to do with Race, Religion, Creed or Colour.

So my statement stands on why you are a racist and considering things you have said on other forums (which I understand we cannot mention or quote here) you are not even an honest one.
Click to expand...

The UK has 4x the murder rate of Japan.

japan: 637 out of 127,000,000
uk: 1,201 out of 61,000,000
 
RDM said:
But native american is a specific ethnic term, English isn't, it is a nationality. If you want to define it as a specific ethnic term then what criteria are you going to use and how are you going to differentiate it from being Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Nothern European etc?
Click to expand...

It is both a nationality and an ethnicity.
 
RDM said:
But native american is a specific ethnic term, English isn't, it is a nationality. If you want to define it as a specific ethnic term then what criteria are you going to use and how are you going to differentiate it from being Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Nothern European etc?
Click to expand...

How about people who have the same DNA as the "English" 1000 years ago? Is that far enough back? That should be long enough for the laws of finders keepers to apply.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/08/070808-england-dna.html

The study compared DNA from ancient and modern Englanders and found that the country has a smaller gene pool than it did a thousand years ago.
Click to expand...
 
dirtydog said:
It is both a nationality and an ethnicity.
Click to expand...

It can be, but you have to specify which meaning you're using. Are you describing people as being English or non-English based on their nationality or ethnicity? Are you descriminating against people who are non-English based on their ethnicity or their nationality? Would you refuse an application for nationality based on ethnicity?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom