I get the feeling Lockheed are used to keeping immensely more valuable information (and easier to sell information) than Stockhausen's religion and and ethnicity secret.
2011 Census soon!
- Thread starter stockhausen
- Start date
- Status
I get the feeling Lockheed are used to keeping immensely more valuable information (and easier to sell information) than Stockhausen's religion and and ethnicity secret.
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 12,130
They aren't going to be any the wiser in seven weeks
As a side issue, what "immensely more valuable" but "easier to sell" information do you "feel" is held by Lockheed Martin or are you talking your usual nonsense?
They aren't going to be any the wiser in seven weeks
As a side issue, what "immensely more valuable" but "easier to sell" information do you "feel" is held by Lockheed Martin or are you talking your usual nonsense?
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/Locations/isgs.html
I'm sure you can use your head.
They aren't going to be any the wiser in seven weeks
As a side issue, what "immensely more valuable" but "easier to sell" information do you "feel" is held by Lockheed Martin or are you talking your usual nonsense?
Well, considering they are the United States biggest defence contractors that is pretty obvious.
^nice list of products with highly profitable and easily transportable data.
Take a wild guess!
You have never heard of a census? How old are you, 7?
I'm staggered. We first got taught about the census in junior school, then in more depth in history lessons at secondary school.
If you were living at home in 2001 (the last census) you won't have actually filled one in yourself but I'm amazed people have never heard of them.
If you were living at home in 2001 (the last census) you won't have actually filled one in yourself but I'm amazed people have never heard of them.
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 12,130
Well, that IS a relief.
To summarise, Lockheed Martin are the American Government's biggest defence contractor and therefore there is absolutely no way that they would ever pass on any data on citizens of a foreign state to the US Government or any commercial organisation - why, they may even refuse to make the data available to the UK Government - I am reassured
Thank God there is such a competent and trustworthy American operation available, allowing the UK Government to avoid having to rely on one of the utterly incompetent and untrustworthy private UK enterprises - our Lords and Masters come to the rescue again - HALLELUJAH!
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 May 2005
- Posts
- 2,964
- Location
- Auckland, New Zealand
I was born in Ramsbottom.. what.. I don't even.. Why do you use Ramsbottom as an example of misleading information? Has this happened before?
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2004
- Posts
- 25,821
- Location
- Glasgow
Possibly for the amusement value, rather like calling yourself Ben Doone or Phil McCavity? Other than that I have no idea why you'd pick Ramsbottom as a particular place to use as misleading information.
This is the country where 1 in 4 people aged from 18 to 30 dont think that Churchill was our prime minister in WW2 because its the name of an insurance company. Frankly, nothing surprises me anymore
This is the country where 1 in 4 people aged from 18 to 30 dont think that Churchill was our prime minister in WW2 because its the name of an insurance company. Frankly, nothing surprises me anymore
Good point.
Sometimes it turns up interesting data, like in the last census (2001) 1% of houses in London (yes London) didnt have their own toilet. (ie it was a communal one rather that a private one). Though its usually more common on the Census to ask how many toilets you have rather than do you have one at all (although the US census usually has the do you have a flush toilet on it)
- Status