B&B Discrimination Case Ruling

its all bs tbh
someone said about anti discriminatory laws
there all bull ****
Why should someone be able to go into a shopping center with full muslim clothing on yet my mam who is 50 wasnt allowed in with a hooded coat in the rain?

The sad fact is the so called anti discriminatory laws are pretty much anti normal british people, and by normal british people i mean white hetrosexual christians

Its a sad state of affairs when gay/lesbian, black/yellow people have more rights in another country than the people who are accualy from there who have relationships with people of the other gender
 
Last edited:
bitslice said:
"Hoteliers who run same-sex guesthouses fear they could be put out of business if they are forced to open their doors to heterosexual couples as it will make their core market feel more self-conscious."
Click to expand...

Well, they cant kick up a fuss one way and then expect to be able to have same sex only hotels unfortunately. Tough.
 
If the law is that you cannot discriminate due to sexual orientation then it needs to work both ways.

Cupra said:
The sad fact is the so called anti discriminatory laws are pretty much anti normal british people, and by normal british people i mean white hetrosexual christians
Click to expand...

Does that mean I am not a normal British person because I am not Christian?
 
You can only laugh at there downright stupidity. So let me get this right you expect to be able as a gay couple to go to a Christian hotel and not get discriminated but when they tables are turned and heterosexuals want to stay at your GAY only hotel your up in arms.

ahahah that's so funny you couldn't make it up.
 
matthewhotdude said:
Me and some mates got turned away from camp sites, because we wasnt a "family" wish I kicked up more of a fuss now,
Click to expand...

but that's not because you are gay.

most campsites/caravan sites do not allow groups of people who aren't families regardless of sexual orientation, but because they make a **** load of noise and annoy the other guests.
 
Robboftw said:
I think by Christian, he meant people that aren't Muslims.
Click to expand...

dont put words into my mouth
what im stating is these laws are to help minoritys fit in not to push hetrosexual british people out

Why should a christian couple let a gay couple stay in there b+b

yet a muslim person can go into a shopping center showing less flesh than a chav in a huddy yet the chav isnt allowed in?

if its ok to back your religion in on sence then why not in another?
 
bitslice said:
thread update:



Gay hotels investigated for breaching equality laws
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...investigated-for-breaching-equality-laws.html

"Hoteliers who run same-sex guesthouses fear they could be put out of business if they are forced to open their doors to heterosexual couples as it will make their core market feel more self-conscious."

I'm sure Christians (some of whom are uncomfortable with gay marriage), would also feel uncomfortable sharing their hotel with gay couples kissing over breakfast?

I get the feeling that anti-discriminatory rules are just there to make us all think the same and penalise us if we don't. Clearly we are all going to feel uncomfortable around unfamiliar groups of people, so why not cater for that fact?
I'm sure Christians have a right to their "culture", just as much as gays have a right to theirs.

I'd hate to see gays lose their own B&B's, but I'd also hate to see Christians lose out on the right to say who sleeps under their roof.
Click to expand...




What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

If you allow Gay-only hotels, then you must equally allow Hetero-only hotels.

That is what equality means.
 
I think some people are misinterpreting the statement from the EHRC.

They haven't said that this particular piece of "equality" law is to be implemented equally. They said they were going to look at whether or not it should be. That's a very different thing. Since homosexuals are a state-approved special interest group, there is ample legal precedent for a ruling that they are entitled to special treatment and don't have to obey the same laws as other people. Which is what I expect the EHRC to quietly state once any media interest has died down.
 
A bit late in this thread but:

atpbx said:
I always thought that a Hotel or shop could refuse to serve anyone they liked without having to give a reason?

The mistake the B&B owners made is probably saying "we dont want to give you pair of homogays a room because man love is evil".

When they should have just said, "we dont want to serve you today, because we dont feel like it, now please leave".
Click to expand...

I think that the problem was that they gave a reason rather than just turning the gold diggers away.

As far as I know, a pub or bar can turn away whoever they want and NOT have to give any reason; I would have thought that the same applied to the B&B.
 
Q: if the B&B had been owned by a Muslim couple would the case had even made it to court?
A: nope


Its ridiculous that the is so much protection for the rights/beliefs of minority's yet none for the rights/beliefs of majority's >.>
 
ubersonic said:
Q: if the B&B had been owned by a Muslim couple would the case had even made it to court?
A: nope


Its ridiculous that the is so much protection for the rights/beliefs of minority's yet none for the rights/beliefs of majority's >.>
Click to expand...

It probably would have, and maybe even generated more media interest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom