Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2005
- Posts
- 16,206
- Location
- Paisley
So if I poison somebody tomorrow it would be classed as a natural process?
Thats a wrong analagy.
So if I poison somebody tomorrow it would be classed as a natural process?
I dont think we can, we cant poison the earth with the earth, everything we create, everything we do all the material that we use that so called poisons the earth comes from the earth.
The earth would in effect be poisoning itself.
Thats a wrong analagy.
Also I *DO* believe we are in the end times and this planet days are numbered. What we're seeing in Japan, ect are warnings and signs of what will soon happen on a planetary scale. People will laugh and refuse to believe it just like people in the last days of Noah laughed and refused to believe.
no if we're part of nature and part of the earth like you said then we are part of the natural process.
everything we do is the natural process.
Thats a wrong analagy.
That can be argued for absolutely everything in the Universe.
Why do anything about Climate Change, or the destruction of Biodiversity, Ecosystems etc...
It is only part of the "natural Process".....
which is why i said biological things aren't part of the earth.
we can't poison the earth because it's inorganic lump, nothing we ahve done has made the planet act differently.
You should get the other side of your head seen to.
What difference does it make if you do or do not believe?
If we're all going to die anyway then why bother caring about it?
It was genuine, please correct me or explain how it is wrong.
How can it be a wrong analogy.
If we accept what you and Tefal are positing as fact, then a Human being poising another Human Being is part of that overall natural process.
We are all part of the Earth, are we not.
The Earth is not only it's mineral composition.
It is also a very contentious point to say that nothing we have ever done has caused the Planet to act differently.
Any Climatologist or Atmospheric scientist will almost certainly have issue with that statement. I suspect that quite a few Geologists may have issue with it also.
It depends on what scales you are working on and as we are talking earthquakes then we are at the plate tectonic scale. I think it is safe to say we have very little impact at all on that side of things. Though I am sure given enough time we may well give it a go one day.
Also bear in mind the response that triggered this off was a reply to magick in a thread in GD. We are not really talking the height of logical discourse...![]()
I quite agree that we have absolutely no impact on plate tectonics or really any permanent major impact on the Earth as a whole (whatever the Global Climate Crew would like us to believe).
I just disagreed that we couldn't poison the Earth, at least on a local scale, or that the Earth is distinct from the Biosphere that (to me at least) is as part of the Planet as it's active tectonics.
I haven't had that much to do with Magick so forgive me if I didn't understand the initial context to your reply, but given his posts and where he is getting his information I can quite understand your position.
I assume that similar to stockhausen, LolMagick is an acceptable and relevant reply to almost, if not all of his posts!![]()
Lolmagick, lolstockhausen, lollysander, lolgroen. The list in full of tinfoil hat wearers.
i despair at the stupidity of some people, i really do.
I will never understand why some people link natural disasters with illuminati or conspiracy theories.
Really does boggle my mind, why do some humans think like that.